Fw: Fuzzy-layering... - Towards better QoS solution in the IPv6 network

["Jason Gao" <[e-mail]>]

But, as far as I know, IPv8 doesn't give a solution for the QoS issue. IPv6 has the potential. I think the killer applications of IPv6, or whichever the next generation IP protocol, are very likely what demand high QoS and natively peer-to-peer, such as video interactive game. If an application doesn't demand high QoS it can somehow be implemented with the inexpensive NAT middleboxes and/or message relays with ripe experience.
> 
> Jason.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jim Fleming" <[e-mail]>
> To: "Fred Baker" <[e-mail]>; "Jason Gao" <[e-mail]>
> Cc: <[e-mail]>; "Richard J. Sexton" <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>; "Joe Baptista" <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>; "@quasar Internet Solutions, Inc." <[e-mail]>; "Vittorio Bertola" <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>; "Richard Henderson" <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>; "Judith Oppenheimer" <[e-mail]>; "Joanna Lane" <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>; "Bruce Young" <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:28 PM
> Subject: Re: Fuzzy-layering and its suggestion - Towards better QoS solution in the IPv6 network
> 
> 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Jason Gao" <[e-mail]>
> > To: "Fred Baker" <[e-mail]>
> > > > 
> > > > You don't get to pull a bit out for your private use.
> > > > 
> > > It is still not a requirement that every node in the Internet must be DS-compliant.
> > > 
> > 
> > Actually, it is just the opposite. The edge of the global, public, 32-bit, IPv4++ Internet
> > is defined as the collection of private companies and people, connected together, that
> > pass 160-bit headers with the 8-bit TOS field unchanged. Those 8-bits can be used
> > to expand the addressing at the edges of that network, 4-bits are needed in each direction.
> > That expands the address space by adding 15 more Internets, as large as the legacy net.
> > You can easily obtain code to do this, or help write more code to do it.
> > 
> > http://www.netfilter.org/
> > http://netfilter.samba.org
> > http://www.google.com/search?q=TOS+routing
> > http://www.google.com/search?q=packet+mangling
> > 
> > As for IPv6, one can not assume that the 128-bit DNS implies IPv6. As an example,
> > if you use a 2002 model year address, such as 2002:[IPv4]:* in the 128-bit DNS AAAA
> > records, your computer will likely generate IPv4 packet headers. A6 DNS records are
> > for IPv6. AAAA records work for IPv4++. Private companies and private individuals
> > are working together to define what goes in the AAAA records. You are FREE to
> > participate. Some private companies and closed societies may try to tell you that you are
> > not free to participate, but that is not the case. Even with tens of millions of dollars from
> > domain name sales and address space leasing, they will not be able to pull together enough
> > money to buy the freedom of all people on planet Earth. They may try...but, most people's
> > minds are not for sale.
> > 
> > Jim Fleming
> > 2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB:...IPv8 is closer than you think...IPv16 is even closer...
> > http://ipv8.dyndns.tv
> > http://ipv8.yi.org
> > http://ipv8.dyns.cx
> > http://ipv8.no-ip.com
> > http://ipv8.no-ip.org
> > http://ipv8.no-ip.biz
> > http://ipv8.no-ip.info
> > http://ipv8.myip.us
> > http://ipv8.dyn.ee
> > http://ipv8.community.net.au
> > http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
> > http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
> > 
> > 
>