Re: IPv6 causes global warming

[Sandy Wills <[e-mail]>]

One of the canine members of my household wants to know what treats will 
be at the interim meeting.  Another one has pointed out that if there 
are felines present, no other treats will be needed, thus saving scarce 
funding for the host.

Sandy

On 11/23/21 8:03 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Those of us who have worked on avian carriers for IPv6 have a great 
> distaste for any lip service paid to cats, as we do not like it at all 
> when packet loss is caused by feline intervention. At the very least, 
> the Security Considerations must discuss this issue, which is only 
> referred to very indirectly in RFC6214. It probably also applies to 
> RFC1149 and RFC2549.
> 
> Regards
>     Brian
> 
> On 24-Nov-21 08:39, Warren Kumari wrote:
>> Section 4 was added purely because Nick Hilliard said that he would
>> DoS the last call process if I didn't include his text; in classic
>> IETF fashion I blustered for a while, before realizing that I don't
>> actually care, and adding the text in the interests of moving the
>> document along. If you object to the section, please take it up with
>> Nick.
>>
>> If you are not able to reach some sort of agreement / compromise with
>> Nick, we can discuss having an interim meeting, potentially with some
>> representation from the feline community. W
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 3:22 AM Eliot Lear <[e-mail]
>> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>
>> I am, sorry, Warren, but I personally cannot support this draft
>> because Section 4 offends me.  I do, however, want to commend you for
>> the number of revisions you have made.
>>
>> Eliot
>>
>> On 22.11.21 21:09, Warren Kumari wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 2:19 PM Nick Hilliard <[e-mail]
>>> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> John Levine wrote on 22/11/2021 18:50:
>>>> But does anyone have any idea what this "report' might be?
>>>
>>> draft-petrescu-v6ops-ipv6-power-ipv4?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Quick! Someone reference
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wkumari-not-a-draft/
>>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wkumari-not-a-draft/> :-P
>>>
>>> W
>>>
>>>
>>> The methodology raises questions about whether the results are
>>> reliable enough to be quoted.
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- The computing scientist’s main challenge is not to get confused
>>> by the complexities of his own making. -- E. W. Dijkstra
>>
>>
>>
>> -- The computing scientist’s main challenge is not to get confused by
>> the complexities of his own making. -- E. W. Dijkstra
> 


-- 
Sandy Wills
[phone]
[e-mail]