Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-20.txt> (Uniform Resource Names (URNs)) to Proposed Standard

Peter Saint-Andre - Filament <peter@filament.com> Fri, 24 February 2017 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@filament.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EA8129DC3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:21:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=filament-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dwPve_jmlTzs for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:21:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x232.google.com (mail-it0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65754129DBE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:21:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x232.google.com with SMTP id h10so21233358ith.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:21:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=filament-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VyNuNxaeYKrNJvMa507R3Joi2Fip0191vXyF/X93Drw=; b=SmjG1Zqb423XLTKjA/1aPahupq7HRjNHaq2tApmlWD6g+GMaTrGYSfAfgnpXbXf16j z0IUoq4ZFq8p5eptIdtAojt/KO0tQ7GUKOyaHIhaQO9BIxukukKsJqKTXoXxLWn8y4vn fXVS7wcf4/cZLtPcF/1AoryxbZjd1zGB1rjag10P+qmZRjDMl0IPJKF2rcOt8mFuevuD l+mpaQqYidmMsPM9DkyA8NEBzkByNpCMBNJ860QGH4nwaVmakryDQsX2dtTzrf/ob3Rn 42RtPahcu6fM7ZQtFacgSaNvb/fKy67pUCqgCA7dmTtYO2Nd+zp+E+Ex4dOE4gn1p6Hf s3SA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VyNuNxaeYKrNJvMa507R3Joi2Fip0191vXyF/X93Drw=; b=g1Pqe4z4mwL8wnHdcggHnwznuH3PYN8pO42V/kB1PJZa5Y0NzAg7/9FJuVdztg6aK0 vP56lUwvjIrrI7ybTfgrxJDntK0k4/2LVhdMGieIiZvXdQhexfqGuWMkjiTrIo3qo4gp 0gxrzzN+ytyPFjlsPNABnfRBfu8aeJgCt+c1igquhGlrIhcjoGMK9gqSGNJDxGGm8L9l iSKgjOSEX2dX9qySpTG5/on8P3DqvSBLQeT8dYDde7Gl6p2VAtsDb0a2csTzlGSr3Owe dPRPbm/7faCRZJpMI7qlNmSkmewjJYDqLylqxG3+7jt51Q0669vG92cIIZgGUIn4f8sj GFZg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mUcLA62htrwoyYued+IVqmnxUidksF+hC4D5aBxWjz7HulLKTV+tg4ox5RBAAuQA==
X-Received: by 10.36.84.138 with SMTP id t132mr2682377ita.100.1487946094298; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:21:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aither.local ([2601:282:4202:67d3:415d:7bd7:5f13:c752]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b88sm743104itd.21.2017.02.24.06.21.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:21:33 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-20.txt> (Uniform Resource Names (URNs)) to Proposed Standard
To: "tom p." <daedulus@btconnect.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <148699853178.24969.7610250025952470052.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <002701d28e9b$a5d5e820$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: Peter Saint-Andre - Filament <peter@filament.com>
Message-ID: <97af6b70-7f89-1374-7f22-d2e92f435c87@filament.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 07:21:33 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <002701d28e9b$a5d5e820$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/CmJgWRTxZCh2AokEqgcehc6T4t8>
Cc: john-ietf@jck.com, alexey.melnikov@isode.com, barryleiba@computer.org, draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn@ietf.org, urnbis-chairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:21:37 -0000

On 2/24/17 5:43 AM, tom p. wrote:
> s.5.2
> " ...and that it (3) not
>    cause the NID to exceed the length limitations defined for the URN
>    syntax (see Section 2). "
> 
> I struggle to see anything in Section 2 that relates to a length
> limitation.

The ABNF in Section 2 has:

      NID           = (alphanum) 0*30(ldh) (alphanum)

Peter