Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework-08.txt> (A Framework for DNSSEC Policies and DNSSEC Practice Statements) to Informational RFC
SM <sm@resistor.net> Fri, 20 July 2012 01:13 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F2011E80CE; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.571
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.571 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.028, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cXEIDa4gxVcB; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:13:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A8611E80A6; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:13:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6K1Do9i027742; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1342746835; bh=SQvZh6Kiq0SZTCEC7cFS0DiVVmKbqh6MRPhaHo5l2/E=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=2qtp/W+OGJSkpWvxWOa6qh6APeyFFI3Huv4e0nItciJt/Oj+iZixqbd6cYrMm24q7 w9pba+DvK2Km2ZIvfQbBctG/e8zE02QSsInzthst84qJX+hdHecekvAXgjDYVRmYWh MA+T1VnidJjKzfqyybSlUP8hlPxoyvQEu98efTLA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1342746835; i=@resistor.net; bh=SQvZh6Kiq0SZTCEC7cFS0DiVVmKbqh6MRPhaHo5l2/E=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=MkA/3QzukdKRMGlEwpcr83vH1gXV4T3tNHnvJ+USu55t2AfIAi9DRjcX12FfcCIuz SiV2odvOfpC7TF0h5KCrpXRKj9wznMgYuJ5EUuKncJfpk1No2yOF0x7aZsaDuXh2ly oWRAiVl2pHy2u54nokrLc7yEs6P7UYUjC+HEpVPk=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120719171949.0a4d0ad8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:10:52 -0700
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework-08.txt> (A Framework for DNSSEC Policies and DNSSEC Practice Statements) to Informational RFC
In-Reply-To: <20120703211559.31773.84433.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20120703211559.31773.84433.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 01:13:04 -0000
At 14:15 03-07-2012, The IESG wrote: >The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG >(dnsop) to consider the following document: >- 'A Framework for DNSSEC Policies and DNSSEC Practice Statements' > <draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework-08.txt> as Informational RFC > >The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits >final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the >ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-07-17. Exceptionally, comments may be This comment is after the deadline. The draft is well-written. Thanks to the authors and DNSOP WG Chairs for moving forward. The question which Russ posted, e.g. Specification change procedures ( http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg73975.html ) may be related to Section 4.1.4 of the draft. A sentence could be added about specification change procedures. Regards, -sm