IETF Logo Mail Archive

barista coffee at IETF 119

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Fri, 12 April 2024 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56F8C14F710 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WZJOS35dN5G6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CAA2C14F691 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD6762420E4A; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:04:09 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
Subject: barista coffee at IETF 119
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2y19iinsy.fsf@ja.int.chopps.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 18:04:08 +0100
Cc: IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <835E53E1-EA2A-4F6C-A0D5-307B9B72E124@rfc1035.com>
References: <DC6C12FF-601C-4180-9FD1-4A1589531113@ietf.org> <m2y19iinsy.fsf@ja.int.chopps.org>
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/E0HbsfCXPx-kPCsH180f3Ypqi0s>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:04:29 -0000


> On 12 Apr 2024, at 16:16, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> wrote:
> 
> For the sake of us remote attendees, can you expand on "Yes, sorry."? Was it missing, was it bad? :)

Since you weren’t there, why do you care? :-)

FWIW I liked the IETF119 barista coffee. Jay didn’t.

It’s great we have barista (or bean to cup) coffee because it’s far, far better than the urns of brown liquid usually supplied by a hotel or conference centre. As a general rule, freshly ground coffee is always preferable - even when the beans or roast are crap.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email