IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-http-problem-01.txt> (Problem Details for HTTP APIs) to Proposed Standard

Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net> Tue, 01 December 2015 11:38 UTC

Return-Path: <erik.wilde@dret.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27F51A90AD; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 03:38:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mov2fcsv-XdC; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 03:38:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cm01fe.ist.berkeley.edu (cm01fe.ist.berkeley.edu [169.229.218.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C59BA1A90AB; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 03:38:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 46-126-159-4.dynamic.hispeed.ch ([46.126.159.4] helo=dretair11.local) by cm01fe.ist.berkeley.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (auth plain:dret@berkeley.edu) (envelope-from <erik.wilde@dret.net>) id 1a3jG3-0000Eg-4A; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 03:38:08 -0800
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-http-problem-01.txt> (Problem Details for HTTP APIs) to Proposed Standard
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, ietf@ietf.org, appsawg-chairs@ietf.org
References: <20151120205655.17511.99851.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <565D6F4A.6060007@gmx.de> <565D7AD6.4000908@dret.net> <565D7D03.8060809@gmx.de>
From: Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net>
Message-ID: <565D869F.7010705@dret.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 12:38:07 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <565D7D03.8060809@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ETLmH63wcX2-X6TJSUTH74y4WV0>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 10:00:39 -0800
Cc: draft-ietf-appsawg-http-problem@ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org, barryleiba@gmail.com
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:38:11 -0000

On 2015-12-01 11:57, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2015-12-01 11:47, Erik Wilde wrote:
>> On 2015-12-01 10:58, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> Minor nit: the media type registration templates miss a few fields
>>> defined in <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6838#section-5.6>.
>> i could only find one and https://github.com/mnot/I-D/pull/162 is adding
>> this last one. which other ones are you missing?
> "Fragment identifier considerations:" ...

thanks, i added those to the existing pull request.

interestingly, when i looked at 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7303#section-9.1 to check which 
information application/xml was specifying there, this registration 
field was missing on the registration as well. same for 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7159#section-11 for application/json, 
which also is missing such a registration field.

thanks and cheers,

dret.

-- 
erik wilde | mailto:erik.wilde@dret.net |
            | http://dret.net/netdret    |
            | http://twitter.com/dret    |

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email