RE: submitting an ID

"Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com> Tue, 23 January 2007 15:57 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H9O1T-0004JR-8e; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:57:23 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H9O1R-0004JH-ND for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:57:21 -0500
Received: from mail128.messagelabs.com ([216.82.250.131]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H9O1Q-0003Rk-D9 for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:57:21 -0500
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-128.messagelabs.com!1169567839!1137741!1
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.10.7.1; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.189.100.102]
Received: (qmail 17147 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2007 15:57:19 -0000
Received: from motgate4.mot.com (HELO motgate4.mot.com) (144.189.100.102) by server-15.tower-128.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 23 Jan 2007 15:57:19 -0000
Received: from az33exr03.mot.com (az33exr03.mot.com [10.64.251.233]) by motgate4.mot.com (8.12.11/Motorola) with ESMTP id l0NFvIu3003941 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 08:57:18 -0700 (MST)
Received: from de01exm64.ds.mot.com (de01exm64.am.mot.com [10.176.8.15]) by az33exr03.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l0NFvHCe026132 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:57:18 -0600 (CST)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:57:16 -0500
Message-ID: <3870C46029D1F945B1472F170D2D979001F74F87@de01exm64.ds.mot.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070123151238.9866C86AEE@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: submitting an ID
Thread-Index: Acc/ASGNdm+BA8XsTAuK9TetEKrrGwABFLTg
References: <20070123151238.9866C86AEE@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
Subject: RE: submitting an ID
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Ditto whether commas and periods should be moved inside quotes when they
are not actually part of the quoted material. When that quoted material
is code or some critical literal string, this silly  rule, which was
actually prompted by typographic considerations of appearance, not only
makes little sense but actually breaks things.

There is no evidence that writing and/or printing have particularly
slowed down the evolution of language. While it is hard to say how
quickly pre-historic languages changed and vocabulary changes faster
than grammar, all living languages appear to evolve and after around 500
to 1000 years have usually changed so much that the old version is
virtually unintelligible to those who do not make it a special item of
study. A book I would recommend on this topic is "The Unfolding of
Language: An Evolutionary Tour of Mankind's Greatest Invention".

Donald

-----Original Message-----
From: Noel Chiappa [mailto:jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 10:13 AM
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: submitting an ID

    > From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>

    > When I was in school, I was taught to quote multiple paragraphs
with
    > quotes at the start of each and a closing quote only at the end of
the
    > final paragraph.

Yeah, but geeks like us love to have their syntactic elements balance,
so I suspect most of us prefer the matching quotation marks! :-) (This
is probably mostly because of our work with computer languages, where
such rules prevail - but also because of our natural love of logic and
order! :-)

Besides, language isn't static anyway (although the advent of writing,
and especially widespread printing, certainly seems to have slowed down
the evolution), and "rule"-books for language should really be thought
of as being more akin to guide-books.

	Noel

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf