Exploring Synergy between Content Aggregation and the Publisher Ecosystem

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Fri, 10 May 2019 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACADF1200F1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2019 13:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.668
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.668 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3rEkFK_gGmNI for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2019 13:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-f42.google.com (mail-ot1-f42.google.com [209.85.210.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02ED81200B8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2019 13:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-f42.google.com with SMTP id a10so4435479otl.12 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2019 13:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Tob+TTSQJfnjpl8Epeqc/I641L5K1MeURXliHE8jyuk=; b=l2a7zjamA1bAcRPQJ/amKMQ7XfNOFOV1xb9HjTwHDpjcRCaiXPBe58q1Cketj6umtc YKviVu/QgwW+rNs9D41RziAt7EQjfk9nrlzQq2m5M2YwMNFat9jUh4fouQe0KS6KEQGN 1J5a7YzjFWSLdIlizkoLUAmhkVOHOnRwXeWowngI3NtWviWY5cCqPIxof0cp5vXPGdfX OaO/jzUUR5xyLGO3T2Ys0cNsy69G6tvWI8AulrrxwZg5FSaeVABZ0vToKdBYiNntCsNS e2YXxy5B8VytpFf7FLh9QNfl+f5jA8++eqwqOUdLmmv+8xiMMaw0cC5bAWmUhl9IfeXL UnNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVP/huMWbUmS30D3v/2QF03mIojzVsAHpR/tdVhgdMyqEIfvPXV lmEuZE7q8KCjdwAhHhYEjiFVQJLFXXVebHuw1ep8zNLhkxI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxbFoxaVxmm5qwsI2QoMzNYeFMZqMY3xsIa+qUBRPQXLpZTQkYC4d5j6iD6p5W1JiEB6fJnLFUcwC2+SrzWQHk=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5a11:: with SMTP id v17mr8331425oth.150.1557520599683; Fri, 10 May 2019 13:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 16:36:30 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwi48QxAfUzT0KeJaq0YhFd06+BNN-uDiM1pb9J+GyNPqw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Exploring Synergy between Content Aggregation and the Publisher Ecosystem
To: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001318e205888e86dc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/FVWhn5j6EIJFIJ8kOZa9490-cfI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 20:36:44 -0000

I am just writing up a paper for the ESCAPE workshop
https://www.iab.org/activities/workshops/escape-workshop/

It is really not clear to me what the focus is here. The CFP swings from
suggesting the focus is on the business issues to requesting proposals
backed by running code and back. We are told point solutions are
discouraged but what is aggregation if not a point solution.

We have a clear problem in the content business. While the current
situation is certainly good for the dominant content discovery services in
short term, it is clearly unsustainable. Content discovery is worthless
unless there is content to be discovered.

Seems to me that maybe we could take a break from some of our other
conversations and take note of the fact that maybe the lack of a payment
mechanism for Web content is starting to be a limiting factor.

Another question that has been greatly concerning Tim Berners-Lee of late
is the concentration of the Web in a very few hands. While there is
certainly a commercial aspect to this concentration, there is also a
political one which should maybe be of greater concern to us. It is
certainly of very great concern to professional politicians and their
advisers.