Re: SIGCOMM and IETF work RE: v6 adoption
Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Fri, 25 July 2014 12:43 UTC
Return-Path: <mallman@icir.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFA71B2851; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 05:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.303
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.303 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vi_GAtINX4w3; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 05:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU [192.150.186.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 080861B2848; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 05:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (envoy.icir.org [192.150.187.30]) by fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.11.20060614/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s6PChQSS006041; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 05:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lawyers.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F85FB46E3C; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:43:26 -0400 (EDT)
To: Aaron Yi DING <Aaron.Ding@cl.cam.ac.uk>
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
Subject: Re: SIGCOMM and IETF work RE: v6 adoption
In-Reply-To: <CANqPRgyU2u-UMPWKLTMa6=1NQsNsZL2s4q4nB=Waw4sFdE1-CA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: International Computer Science Institute (ICSI)
Song-of-the-Day: Touch of Grey
X-URL-0: http://www.icir.org/mallman-files/Document61030.pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="--------ma20718-1"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:43:26 -0400
Sender: mallman@icir.org
Message-Id: <20140725124326.6F85FB46E3C@lawyers.icir.org>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/FX5FiREZDg308iv4OyLQ6EMIdrU
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:27:22 -0700
Cc: diversity-dt@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mallman@icir.org
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:43:41 -0000
> Surely relevant! It benefits both sides to follow up the latest > progress, either via conferences or IETF pipeline. Yup. > As part of the work for IETF diversity group, our joint paper between > Cambridge and Helsinki got the best paper award from ACM - "Best of CCR", > and to be presented in ACM SIGCOMM, August 2014: > http://conferences.sigcomm.org/sigcomm/2014/program.php I noticed that the other day, actually. I popped the paper up in my PDF reader and plan to read it. I certainly agree there should be more exchange between the research and IETF communities. That said, I feel like I can only say that so loudly given that I used to play in both sandboxes, but have largely backed away from the IETF myself and so its a little hard to say "hey, everyone should play there!". Many thanks! allman
- SIGCOMM and IETF work RE: v6 adoption Aaron Yi DING
- Re: SIGCOMM and IETF work RE: v6 adoption Mark Allman