Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 03 June 2008 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90FF93A6805; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 10:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E6E3A6815 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 10:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6drylMoaMPWr for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 10:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-6.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-6.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.136]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12143A67EF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 10:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned
X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:41204) by ppsw-6.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.156]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1K3aRz-0002uq-JQ (Exim 4.67) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:37:35 +0100
Received: from fanf2 (helo=localhost) by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local-esmtp id 1K3aRz-00078v-0B (Exim 4.67) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:37:35 +0100
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:37:35 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9
In-Reply-To: <cmu-lmtpd-26544-1212513958-0@cyrus-27.csi.private.cam.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.1.00.0806031837010.8138@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <200806021350.m52Do7tj032327@drugs.dv.isc.org> <4843FE7D.2060503@it.uc3m.es> <7b1e7a950806030743l7afffe7ch899dc91347b23a08@mail.gmail.com> <20080603151056.46DEC3A6ACC@core3.amsl.com> <alpine.LSU.1.00.0806031739310.8138@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <cmu-lmtpd-26544-1212513958-0@cyrus-27.csi.private.cam.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Michael StJohns wrote:

> The particular document at issue is "Default Address Selection for IP
> version 6".  If you want to raise a similar issue for IPv4, I'm sure
> that there is an appropriate WG list for that as well.

The RFC covers IPv4 too, as it says in the abstract.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
IRISH SEA: WESTERLY BACKING SOUTHERLY 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 IN SOUTH. SLIGHT
OR MODERATE. RAIN LATER. MODERATE OR GOOD, OCCASIONALLY POOR LATER.
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf