IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root)

Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Tue, 06 August 2002 21:22 UTC

Received: from loki.ietf.org (loki [10.27.2.29]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA29723; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 17:22:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from adm@localhost) by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id RAA09163 for ietf-outbound.10@loki.ietf.org; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 17:24:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [10.27.2.28]) by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA09133 for <ietf-mainout@loki.ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 17:22:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id RAA29589 for ietf-mainout@loki.ietf.org; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 17:21:33 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: ietf.org: majordom set sender to owner-ietf@ietf.org using -f
Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu (turing-police.cc.vt.edu [198.82.160.121]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA29584 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 17:21:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing-police.cc.vt.edu (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g76LM9pI006907; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 17:22:09 -0400
Message-Id: <200208062122.g76LM9pI006907@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4+dev
To: Einar Stefferud <Stef@thor.nma.com>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 06 Aug 2002 01:33:48 PDT." <v04220801b975340d5a23@[192.168.1.14]>
X-Url: http://black-ice.cc.vt.edu/~valdis/
X-Face-Viewer: See ftp://cs.indiana.edu/pub/faces/index.html to decode picture
X-Face: 34C9$Ewd2zeX+\!i1BA\j{ex+$/V'JBG#; 3_noWWYPa"|,I#`R"{n@w>#:{)FXyiAS7(8t( ^*w5O*!8O9YTe[r{e%7(yVRb|qxsRYw`7J!`AM}m_SHaj}f8eb@d^L>BrX7iO[<!v4-0bVIpaxF#-) %9#a9h6JXI|T|8o6t\V?kGl]Q!1V]GtNliUtz:3},0"hkPeBuu%E,j(:\iOX-P,t7lRR#
References: <200208052109.g75L9JY00889@astro.cs.utk.edu> <v04220801b975340d5a23@[192.168.1.14]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1273314357P"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 17:22:09 -0400
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org

On Tue, 06 Aug 2002 01:33:48 PDT, Einar Stefferud said:
> Please cite a real case of success at our supposed motive of disruption.

OK.  You can count this one of two ways:

1) One "real case" for each TLD that ORSC has deployed that ICANN hasn't
(include .BIZ in there).

2) Zero - but in that case, you have to acknowledge that ORSC is an ignorable
player that doesn't actually matter to anybody.

You can't have it both ways - if ORSC is used enough that it matters, then
by definition every use of a TLD that isn't in ICANN's root is disruptive.
The only way that can be NOT disruptive is if ORSC isn't used....


-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Computer Systems Senior Engineer
				Virginia Tech

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email