IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth-03.txt> (E-mail Authentication for Internationalized Mail) to Proposed Standard

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 26 March 2019 11:00 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5A912031A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qzppwp_g5o0u for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D4BD1202E5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id v14so8430160lfi.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Tx8Aid+XFnD3qxkX769GvTJre0qPghQ9AaEdNdb3X0k=; b=pQSEFdHck3FsgCahvkZ33VIs54Huqj4opCC5ASOo65T9PV9vG5uMo3KWpkd1skHb7l waxBLhJs5Fa2haRKFzGMnJcUqGIpk7Ia8SqIZLzuNchy4FGKAmfTUyWqwOjJmP8RHMWD UVnrM9ysio/mB/9ySaFyDyAllDzmjkIBFv/LavAir69DNaWyf5qbklOWLBh7+dWkSrEJ 6BlQEeDqszIGRfwBUrS/hBSccfAtAEbB/++Zn+zJbyOA1BFmppOnB9j9EPfXWOkM1sON X7URCkoer89DqR7CxBwe0j5lltYnC31KyDkCWdUhRUSGGkECT7Dm7u+p1w1O0eN2c5zW L2pw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Tx8Aid+XFnD3qxkX769GvTJre0qPghQ9AaEdNdb3X0k=; b=m2ZxvQLFB0AaHCSY5fSRoGOP9D9INpTCtjkZT/HPRIijd384f8WzTqWqpEbn80GLFf EJvHxQ5dryucNsOYeio67JxoRDBiJE9TGJwULlJox8nwkFtGCAohXzBwE+YU9oXVxcpE YVlP2Pi3ofNjsHagL/Yvwf3v6j7K1GvVSPAuu4PiNgrfgXZRohsYgDq1FYW6yAzapDaH vGNLXEKJ8Nxl2KrsbgP3ACsCheo1j3njHX/crdpTzFiSruvNH4bwFEogp9o+RsPCPEBY /l/XRrsGoJfIG48X7cGBeVhMyTZdPU+8AXLmiv7nWKyZ9/5MzGUBiRnLvaeqPlPnACOU ltjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXZPAVtCx152XbmkczPpmiHYRrNUrfPNnJoj6ajrhKTth4wV0uI TQxnPU5oznsZls9TTXB29jWhWEVisuZFkZ6DkcCQ4LJK
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy5imHPLxCh8YWOuxaqwA5xHA/fyABG+NvWwdnMpXvF95fFH5NtCR7z6oZtldgyPzNsMIe06fYgrmH0rqENyXc=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5966:: with SMTP id h6mr3576753lfp.86.1553598032132; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155136469958.28684.8810231208348252093.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190324024454.0c6c6508@elandnews.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1903241125420.93077@ary.local> <6.2.5.6.2.20190324085309.0ebc3308@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20190324085309.0ebc3308@elandnews.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:00:20 +0100
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZR45EX6aJrLWaK0Ft3dU1+OUPjb_y5w460XBz6jtv+nw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth-03.txt> (E-mail Authentication for Internationalized Mail) to Proposed Standard
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d441490584fd3a3a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/GImkttaoHATjLL5AOMNpV1bfH0M>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:00:40 -0000

On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 5:33 PM S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:

> >Because it does.  See the second paragraph of section 6.  The
> >existing 7489 language in several places that says "the domain name
> >must be converted to an A-label" is wrong since mail addresses don't
> >contain single label domains.
>
> There are other (reported) technical issues with that RFC.  I gather
> that the DMARC working group is not interested in fixing that
> specification.
>

As Kurt pointed out, we're chartered to do a standards track version of
DMARC as our ultimate deliverable.  We would be compelled to go through
verified errata as part of that process.  We just haven't started it yet.

I'm meeting with Tim later today to discuss our next batch of potential
milestones, etc., and that's part of the discussion.

-MSK (chairin')

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email