Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-enum-combined-08.txt

Black_David@emc.com Wed, 11 June 2008 15:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EADC63A69CB; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5253A6AE0; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q1-jOAdNdNeK; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5A43A68A6; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si03.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI03.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.23]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id m5AM9oHr019046 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:09:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (uraeus.lss.emc.com [10.254.144.14]) by hop04-l1d11-si03.isus.emc.com (Tablus Interceptor); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:48:27 -0400
Received: from corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com (corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com [10.254.64.53]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id m5AM4SmP001794; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:04:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Black_David@emc.com
Received: from CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com ([128.221.62.12]) by corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:04:43 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-enum-combined-08.txt
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:04:42 -0400
Message-ID: <8CC6CEAB44F131478D3A7B429ECACD91016F63B5@CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-enum-combined-08.txt
Thread-Index: AcjLRfweDwmVY4KCRZqyMunj3kvPGw==
To: <mah@inode.at>, <otmar.lendl@enum.at>, <richard.stastny@oefeg.at>, <gen-art@ietf.org>, <enum@ietf.org>, <ietf@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jun 2008 22:04:43.0242 (UTC) FILETIME=[FCACBCA0:01C8CB45]
X-Tablus-Inspected: yes
X-Tablus-Classifications:
X-Tablus-Action:
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:28:07 -0700
Cc: Black_David@emc.com, jon.peterson@neustar.biz
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Authors,

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call
comments you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-enum-combined-08.txt
Reviewer: David L. Black
Review Date: 10 June 2008
IETF LC End Date: 16 June 2008

Summary:

This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.

Comments:

This is a reasonably straightforward draft describing use of
e164.arpa for an interim Infrastructure ENUM solution.  Pragmatism
outweighs elegance in this domain (e.g., the variable-length
structure of country codes), and this draft outlines a reasonable
pragmatic solution to the problem it addresses.

This draft is in very good shape - kudos to the authors.

A DNS Directorate review should be obtained for this draft.

The UK (+44) phone numbers used in examples are not on the
ID-Checklist's list of fictitious phone numbers, but consulting
the UK Ofcom's official list (linked to the ID-Checklist)
reveals that the  number are in fact fictitious.  This is fine.

idnits 2.08.10 found three rather minor items that only need
to be addressed if a new version of the draft is prepared for
other reasons, as the RFC Editor will handle these in the
normal course of editing:

  == The copyright year in the IETF Trust Copyright Line does not match
the
     current year

  == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-enum-infrastructure-enum-reqs has
been
     published as RFC 5067

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-07) exists of
     draft-ietf-enum-infrastructure-06

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf