IETF Logo Mail Archive

xml2rfc v3 vs v2, was: Survey design and interpretation (was: Re: Final reminder: Please fill out our survey on IETF authoring tools)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 04 November 2020 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3DC3A133A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 08:46:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E9VqOl1DcPVU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 08:46:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB95C3A133B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 08:46:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1604508396; bh=Ya/mf6Z1TI1dFtxhsmVwNsU6tRZ4+rQiS3uclfnOzFM=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=EFyvsrpQDqFbk13P5jp3Iqkn1E/mEN+IPj0L/u3MEYDZYdzoMQWd9oWsov2J4dF5C IgM24dv/DokUwT7EGpx0WngQQDSguSkaaJAIcPCXWuErd5JA+3Fj831hyzy95td8nZ 6Rg0CjhS6xKwp4QUPAig5gpEEwm93bRm0U9MPOdQ=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([84.171.145.1]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MacSe-1k2ejm1Acs-00cBCm for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 17:46:36 +0100
Subject: xml2rfc v3 vs v2, was: Survey design and interpretation (was: Re: Final reminder: Please fill out our survey on IETF authoring tools)
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <13142C01-A8D9-4F60-B915-7355AACB5BA6@ietf.org> <6F9AA104ADD5D24B1A05A1F0@PSB>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <c9918ff2-cb3d-ee7a-0e5b-f97dd9894885@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 17:46:36 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6F9AA104ADD5D24B1A05A1F0@PSB>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:6VTxkvmDgIyngitSl9/2vVuQ5y1TsDQIXZqDlKjIDSLKOayQbdP FuyyYCrLlL8zPzxiobT5gqt0G/B4PvCjDL5H5YqJ0rN2cYeVA/b+U1bOpBGw0fmDs7EyEld vZB/KS5xUj84NfoadcQNZLmILObjBLWkk1MhMc2LEnTPoYAU311nZ/NokBuReRpXu9+WvZt yQ7VqKl6KGj9KmU/yUtcw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:j/APoNk4o5Y=:+liorrciEJm0iSQAT039Gy R4nCwz9bBtyr41mfM9vXKFSf/cu5jSzWoeRhY7pYdXTOD6HxZmPI06N+CVxUpy+Zye6bbR/bp nO3Lemf8tRB6Ghd265V8nr+gWYmAslAggCs/HHbtA7CRgRAiIxh+mRVhRzbpxUOwiT+Vp0GzM liQOjGCS/6NtI+KaQ+9sVnfEodSksjatzqYc9mNFcFze0zO9EJOVZdRvPNMrYD0SIWzs9CRtY foIanDj9W7hxwc6w0yyF0aL4sjvsQeUoVqliyvMS429CXm7V41mNFO3II6Kx8/UQjAXsqvtST ETG6XxXvDitofilNnyx91Bd2aZRg2uMWduqXMRn3U/i0yY2SYZ1ltANcLvGS7Ba/nDCT43kyR Y/afUDNHrc77NIkW0jIEcwVjCnEiKCtyMrFzldRPnG49ZryylWPKdq/J24qIovXqsxVUXCgui cbrc566/4/AD8k07GgFaKd4a1tp/QkFp0SoUvG2E0CNwzQJG0jXLWqsJ0uFYiSt7WJncZkLrh apAEIsDqGL3pl7/0i468RI7TpMt5vI8XIRqGMuYqKzRYRyI4L/4Ass4zJy/gNWhs6qlhHPbXL NHH6C/+514cYL6HA4j1AaDt384oYJaZST8JT30sI0oyp2DuzKGQVWEZBPiajyeWGQWBfR7Ni1 sLGCQNYjndqyVcZLpTl/DEeQAZql9nfXJCftzr3JCM4sYEKfPXqmUbktfMalTkOLeUVK38HJF WvFCm81ZajL0+pMuSMTwGzral6oBIL6ozQXsN4mmvbWQoTz7Jx7N3DtiQMAk125xJHluwvwQL gdLKohaEYf3gEoWFshNYi/vXcLqOAKfTCcy5o+GVqACrflOppcn1ql2yun4O4evxMmCE+yKeY mA72qWzoka5i6OnaXQ/XeEiHl8PwKDvNOHK1UDedY=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Gj5VZx7Y0GET9LEGaYaXhzYc9u4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 16:46:41 -0000

John,

replying to one bit of special interest to me:

Am 04.11.2020 um 16:48 schrieb John C Klensin:
> (4.c) Then there are questions about how satisfied I am with
> xml2rfc as an authoring tool, with a scale from "very satisfied"
> to "very dissatisfied".  Reasonable question except that there
> are some of us who are "very" (or closer than "nearly")
> satisfied with v2 (perhaps for substantive reasons and perhaps
> because we are just used to it) and very dissatisfied with v3.
 > ...

I would really like to understand what would make you be unhappy with v3
as opposed to v2. Could you please elaborate a bit (either here, or on a
more xml2rfc-specific list)?

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email