Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-09
Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Mon, 03 September 2018 12:43 UTC
Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D8B130E2F; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 05:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: tram@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud.all@ietf.org
Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-09
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.83.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153597861719.13253.13043738114222950149@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 05:43:37 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/H_GKl6GvYhzNNt5MbVObPZ5L-L0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 12:43:37 -0000
Reviewer: Roni Even Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-?? Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date: 2018-09-03 IETF LC End Date: 2018-09-12 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: The documents is ready for publication as a standard track RFC with nits and minor issues Major issues: Minor issues: 1. The security section says " The PMTUD mechanism described in this document does not introduce any specific security considerations" yet section 5.1 talk about amplification attack Nits/editorial comments: 1. In section 2 last paragraph "Probe Indications of various sizes" any guidelines about the sizes and how many indications?
- Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-p… Roni Even
- Re: [tram] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- RE: [Gen-art] [tram] Genart last call review of d… Roni Even (A)