Re: Conclusion of Last Call for draft-ietf-sieve-convert anddraft-ietf-sieve-notify-sip-message

[Pete Resnick <[e-mail]>]

Good idea. I've added a comment to the tracker in the History section 
for both documents.

pr

On 2/29/12 4:12 AM, t.petch wrote:
> Pete
>
> I agree with what you have done but would like to see it recorded in something
> more accessible than an e-mail archive.  Could it be added to the data tracker,
> under IESG evaluation or IESG writeup or some such?
>
> Tom Petch
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pete Resnick"<[e-mail]>
> To: "IETF-Discussion list"<[e-mail]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 9:32 PM
>    
>> I wanted to inform the community of the results of the second Last Call
>> issued for draft-ietf-sieve-convert and
>> draft-ietf-sieve-notify-sip-message. To remind you of the circumstances:
>> After these two documents were approved by the IESG and sent on to the
>> RFC Editor, an IPR disclosure was made pertaining to each of them
>> indicating that one of the document editors for both documents was also
>> the listed inventor for the disclosed patent. The disclosures were made
>> by the document editor's employer and indicate that the date of the
>> patent filings was prior to the adoption of these two drafts by the
>> SIEVE working group. The RFC Editor was asked to suspend their work on
>> the documents, and a second Last Call was made.
>>
>> After reviewing discussions in the SIEVE WG and on the IETF mailing
>> list, the chairs have decided (and I support) that, because of the
>> failure to disclose the IPR as required by BCP 79 (RFC 3979), and as per
>> RFC 2418 Section 6.1, the following actions are appropriate and will be
>> taken:
>>
>> - The document editor in question is no longer a document editor for
>> these two documents.
>> - The person's name will be removed from the front page of the documents
>> and from the Authors' Address section.
>> - The person's name will be added to the Acknowledgments section of both
>> documents to identify that he did contribute text to the drafts.
>> - The RFC Editor will be asked to continue processing and publication of
>> these drafts as RFCs.
>>
>> We will be notifying the RFC Editor of this decision presently.
>>
>> Meanwhile, the employer of the document editor in question has made
>> followup disclosures on each of the documents, saying that they
>> "covenant not to assert any such claim against any party for making,
>> using, selling, offering for sale or importing a product that implements
>> the corresponding part of the specification." The full text of the
>> disclosures can be seen here:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1680/
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1681/
>>
>> pr
>>
>> --
>> Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
>> Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
>>
>>      
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>    

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]