Re: URI IPR
"t.petch" <daedulus@btconnect.com> Fri, 21 May 2010 14:31 UTC
Return-Path: <daedulus@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE453A83D6; Fri, 21 May 2010 07:31:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.600, BAYES_50=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j9ES9qV4D2iS; Fri, 21 May 2010 07:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c2beaomr06.btconnect.com (c2beaomr06.btconnect.com [213.123.26.184]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB163A769C; Fri, 21 May 2010 02:55:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pc6 (host86-172-78-59.range86-172.btcentralplus.com [86.172.78.59]) by c2beaomr06.btconnect.com with SMTP id CWW22084; Fri, 21 May 2010 10:55:29 +0100 (BST)
X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=0001.0A0B0301.4BF65890.02D1, actions=tag
Message-ID: <003c01caf8c2$f40b3700$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <daedulus@btconnect.com>
To: Marshall Eubanks <tme@americafree.tv>
References: <017801caf360$a477b900$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <4086301E-BDC5-49A9-8CCE-97AB2F442BB4@americafree.tv>
Subject: Re: URI IPR
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 10:52:29 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2beaomr06.btconnect.com
X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0209.4BF65892.0320, ss=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2009-07-20 21:54:04, dmn=5.7.1/2009-08-27, mode=single engine
X-Junkmail-IWF: false
Cc: Trustees <trustees@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 14:31:23 -0000
Marshall Here is another mailing list for you, v6ops, except that this has no 'Note Well' at all, just #### No info available for v6ops This is another 'non-IETF' list but is a (sometimes:-) active WG; it also never sends out monthly reminders so I imagine noone on it ever sees a 'Note Well'. (And it has not got a web interface, as far as I can see:-(. Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marshall Eubanks" <tme@americafree.tv> To: "t.petch" <daedulus@btconnect.com> Cc: "IETF Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>; "Trustees" <trustees@ietf.org> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 4:02 PM Subject: Re: URI IPR > > On May 14, 2010, at 8:26 AM, t.petch wrote: > > > Signing up to the URI list, I find it tells me, inter alia, that > > > > "All IETF Contributions are subject to the rules of RFC 3978 and RFC > > 3979. > > > > Statements made outside of an IETF session, mailing list or other > > function, that are clearly not intended to be input to an IETF > > activity, > > group or function, are not IETF Contributions in the context of this > > notice. > > > > Please consult RFC 3978 for details." > > > > I was slightly surprised to see anything, since it is a list hosted > > by the W3C > > and not the IETF, and imagined that it was as much subject to their > > rules than > > the IETF's, but ... > > > > Assuming that IETF rules are needed, should this have been updated > > to the > > replacement RFC? > > > > Unlike the IETF lists, I have never seen a reminder on the URI list > > about any > > subscription so this 'Note Well' may be all anyone ever sees. > > > > Thank you for bringing this to our attention. This is a mailing list > for a WG concluded in 1995 and hosted elsewhere; I imagine that this > is just an oversight. > > I will look into this for the Trust and see if we can get it updated. > > Regards > Marshall > > > > Tom Petch > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ietf mailing list > > Ietf@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > >
- URI IPR t.petch
- Re: URI IPR Marshall Eubanks
- Re: URI IPR t.petch
- Finding a patent t.petch
- Re: Finding a patent Michael StJohns
- Re: Finding a patent Stephan Wenger
- Re: Finding a patent Stephan Wenger
- Re: Finding a patent t.petch
- Re: https Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: https Thomas Narten
- Re: https Eliot Lear
- Re: https Scott Schmit
- https t.petch
- Re: https SM
- Re: https t.petch
- Re: https Eric Burger
- Re: https Donald Eastlake
- Re: https Tim Bray
- Re: https t.petch
- Re: https John C Klensin
- Re: https Joel jaeggli
- Re: https Melinda Shore
- Re: https ned+ietf
- Re: https t.petch
- Re: https Adam Novak
- Re: https Adam Novak
- Re: https ned+ietf
- Re: https Adam Novak
- Re: https Keith Moore
- Re: https Melinda Shore
- Re: https Eric Burger
- Re: https Doug Barton
- Re: https John C Klensin
- Re: https Glen Zorn
- Re: https t.petch
- Re: https t.petch
- Re: https t.petch
- Re: https Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: https Dave CROCKER
- Re: https Joel jaeggli
- Re: https ned+ietf
- Re: https Melinda Shore
- Re: https ned+ietf
- Re: https Glen Zorn
- Re: https ned+ietf
- Re: https Joel jaeggli
- Re: https t.petch
- Re: https Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: https Hector Santos
- Re: https Hector Santos
- Re: https Hector Santos
- Re: https t.petch
- Re: https SM
- Re: https Adam Novak
- Re: https Frank Ellermann
- Re: https Marshall Eubanks
- Re: https Alexa Morris