IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Comments on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-11

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Fri, 05 May 2017 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F4A124E15; Fri, 5 May 2017 12:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.819
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.819 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tb0u4qhAPozc; Fri, 5 May 2017 12:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D53E12714F; Fri, 5 May 2017 12:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Orochi.local ([172.56.4.191]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v45JSr0H042791 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 5 May 2017 14:28:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [172.56.4.191] claimed to be Orochi.local
Subject: Re: Comments on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-11
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <C49A16E7-1680-4FC9-A423-15A32EFF3D8F@mnot.net> <21A01174-4FB6-4F8C-AA3D-DCF6D1FEBA01@trammell.ch> <8cb6fefd-200e-1d90-6a36-c32530ecbaf8@cisco.com> <8114ef76-591f-630e-5464-2b63d0efea61@huitema.net> <BF887C92-1ADD-47F7-A958-04538372AA15@qti.qualcomm.com> <BD3807D4-6253-4A3E-BA34-00CA1DAB5037@mnot.net> <77af81f1-5ab0-c94c-4f3d-9d31edf55b2b@cisco.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <777c900d-8be2-a41c-c7ea-5705a9b1405e@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 15:28:47 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <77af81f1-5ab0-c94c-4f3d-9d31edf55b2b@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/IJANCWvYOwbJFVpvJXb8CtuXfRw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 19:29:07 -0000

On 5/4/17 03:06, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Furthermore, if we don't publish in order to avoid being misconstrued...

I have not yet heard anyone publicly say this document should not be 
published, and I find it a bit disingenuous to construe requests for 
improvement in such a way. <https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman>

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email