Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch

[Ted Hardie <[e-mail]>]

Hi Ben,

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Ben Campbell <[e-mail]> wrote:
> On Oct 14, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
>
>> On the general clarity, I also have to say that I believe that the document
>> tipped over the "diff" line somewhere.  That is, as a set of edits it is now
>> sufficiently complex that it would almost certainly be better to apply
>> the edits and re-spin the whole document rather than provide a set of
>> textual diffs in the current format.  If the ADs and WG chairs feel that there
>> is no energy to tackle such a major editorial change, however, I certainly
>> understand.  It is possible to build up the correct state with the two
>> documents;
>> it is just more difficult.
>
> Hi Ted,
>
> Do I understand correctly that you mean a respin of RFC 4975?
>
> Thanks!

Yes, I do.  But I understand if that is not practical at this point in time.

regards,

Ted

>
> Ben.