Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process
Beatrice Martini <mail@beatricemartini.it> Wed, 25 April 2018 19:55 UTC
Return-Path: <mail@beatricemartini.it>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30642129C6E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.609
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=beatricemartini-it.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o2_gYylnD4p3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22a.google.com (mail-it0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9300B129C6D for <IETF@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id m134-v6so21536023itb.3 for <IETF@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=beatricemartini-it.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=qUWbfW2mVKBGZWuKoizad1jgA4bwOsttKJOZ8O/u1QA=; b=fUhRgkHlQzV3Kboigr8/MQfHUV7DIFKcGdZGbyurk3ewbmCEZht/jgTxL40QOsnNHb cP1QkslF07Hbce4q2x01T7MxB1dYt1jA85svQrh4Lcitf18ahZDlB3pUHFRK1OgAkxL3 zZcw0juxhxjCkb4pZq1G+/UBCo+4pJ0evpG07QOCCSYNdyWA3OZ/6zaDyZWxFr4CHbGT /0n+a4fSzESDbb3h+/APsuhxq/+G4lPt3crRXdanT8dOfDEWj4CU/CqToOzgL9J6NPu9 hEuU2QRC4uUmnMKrt5G7i6AKylMh+iL6PgwcG/2AOeZTiarm/Hq7HLhvBkinQetev11+ dk5Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=qUWbfW2mVKBGZWuKoizad1jgA4bwOsttKJOZ8O/u1QA=; b=uXExArBzwjQ+ewN+GztN8ArFoATMwCKj3n1SLewgW80zcjluXbT2hJJkErvghUUHJF /WNovOqk7bJnwiLI5jzXuERJGsi+mu4BKo2jpzCcQ8CG7cJE4yNfCSsv5GnUbWqiuLHZ fZQ5H1na6O/VAieTRMAPJ6povnvlbRiZnVJPV0MZCJ69RHvBJ73Hn5dBpDv6laOpOiOO Zyb/2T0eAUEVH7snzVG+VPAPWatCiunhAhk7B8IPPjU1fWLgUQ/J5CyMCzrqE5IFlbsS Ugs2PB4OlX23msD/OYmkUNg//LuQgHOW0krKBmBtzDOBlqh2hkz/IEsOv+l6sVhZElf2 C54w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBrlEoLTvTe+8E3+EU/Yu+BCI+jwy1L8cA6B9OrCKSHuBVrpaV5 uajjElTVn2DfomOjmew2ViJTVI16jIbY9tJiXRYrGIyv
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/CMnEp0+BG+jt2+jQuIX5IYskZF7YbNp6tg0MC3m10V6nJ+0KWn/ozQb806kR6Inmx+Jpsw4jHQUu4VsCuU2Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:c146:: with SMTP id e67-v6mr23747275itg.70.1524686114608; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a02:840e:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Beatrice Martini <mail@beatricemartini.it>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 21:55:13 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+0Hr7syW5Jy8eyQxBU_GCbL+Omj0uR-x6bBB_Y0PjcNQ8wM2g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process
To: ietf <IETF@ietf.org>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000419747056ab1a699"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/IUE8dU35Wg1Zj4HCVLlpN1XieCM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 19:55:18 -0000
Hi Eliot, Thank you for summarizing the current state of the discussion on possible edits. I have just subscribed to the list and can only access your message from the Archive. So, as far as I can see, the only way for me to reply is to start a new thread. My apologies. I hope that keeping the same subject will help to minimize the inconveniece. Please find below feedback in regards to some of the requirements under consideration. On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>; wrote: > There are currently five additional requirements under consideration: > > 1. No smoking - Proposed Section 3.1 > 2. Gender-neutral rest rooms - Proposed Section 3.3 Feedback: Add a note on gender neutral restrooms to Section 3.2.2 Basic Venue Criteria (not Section 3.3). Proposed text: "Venue and Facilities should have at least one gender neutral restroom, with stalls and no urinals, on each floor." > 3. Child care facilities - Proposed Section 3.3 Feedback: Add two notes to Section 3.3. Other Considerations. Proposed texts: "It is desirable for Venue and Facilities to have at least one dedicated infant feeding room and one family restroom." "It is desirable that preferably the Facility, or failing that the IETF Hotel(s), offer licensed childcare." > 4. Conflicts regarding people with special needs or disabilities ??? You made a good point about this topic not being an actual criterion. It is a kind of information that does not need to be shared in this document. Other documents where it would be very good to include a note on this type of conflict and how it will be addressed could be: * Documentation related to the event management on site; * Information provided to participants to inform them about venue accessibility. Thanks! Best, Beatrice > 5. Budget hotels - Already present in Section 3.2 > > > At the moment there is proposed text for (1) and (3). I do not have text > for (2) or (4) yet. I believe Pete asked for feedback from the IAOC on (2) > in particular, and I have questions regarding what to write on (4). It > seems we are zooming in on closing the last point (5) with no changes. > > Eliot > > _______________________________________________ > Mtgvenue mailing list > Mtgvenue@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue >
- editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-s… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Mary Barnes
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Beatrice Martini
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… John C Klensin
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Randy Bush
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… John C Klensin
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Mtgvenue] venue features and prices, editor'… John Levine
- Re: [Mtgvenue] venue features and prices, editor'… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Mtgvenue] venue features and prices, editor'… John R Levine
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Alissa Cooper