Re: Thoughts from IETF-92 correction
Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us> Wed, 01 April 2015 21:43 UTC
Return-Path: <richard@shockey.us>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1201A86EC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mqXvOSEkPMg9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (qproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [66.147.248.250]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 52EBA1A854D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 1999 invoked by uid 0); 1 Apr 2015 21:43:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by qproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 1 Apr 2015 21:43:09 -0000
Received: from box462.bluehost.com ([74.220.219.62]) by cmgw4 with id ArP11q00H1MNPNq01rP4L5; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:23:08 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=PLucp5aC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=jTEj1adHphCQ5SwrTAOQMg==:117 a=jTEj1adHphCQ5SwrTAOQMg==:17 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=Jklo8jbM_8AA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=MKtGQD3n3ToA:10 a=1oJP67jkp3AA:10 a=ZZnuYtJkoWoA:10 a=8WrITzYgnNwA:10 a=HGEM6zKYvpEA:10 a=e9J7MTPGsLIA:10 a=PjKxOo5e63nizD8r8D4A:9 a=i_CQfmcEmqQcITV-:21 a=X-WuzmqtShFq75an:21 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shockey.us; s=default; h=Content-transfer-encoding:Content-type:Mime-version:Message-ID:CC:To:From:Subject:Date; bh=ZnvJX4mgHNXOUT0ZXrF2SEST+YT2jOHgjydirhZFc1A=; b=LDEHzc477E4WNt+I4Q3AotNoWP2ydHY0AZeIGM3WkUz66eL9V8Cg6ELlA/D0ClUBttK13PXkH7Hzmpl1hs/W4jjhl8HR3ZSFpI3kXmDV59BIj4NDWb6fKj9zf6TGkG3u;
Received: from [108.56.131.201] (port=58488 helo=[192.168.1.12]) by box462.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <richard@shockey.us>) id 1YdQ6I-0004wx-8H; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 15:23:02 -0600
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.8.150116
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:22:57 -0400
Subject: Re: Thoughts from IETF-92 correction
From: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Message-ID: <D141D812.232AB%richard@shockey.us>
Thread-Topic: Thoughts from IETF-92 correction
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
X-Identified-User: {3286:box462.bluehost.com:shockeyu:shockey.us} {sentby:smtp auth 108.56.131.201 authed with richard+shockey.us}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/IjlYU3nehsZ6N63QgxksKy7qSOg>
Cc: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:43:16 -0000
Small Correction E.164 voice in the US is about 140 Billion out of a total telecom market of 580 Billion or so. That number is a decent guesstimate based on all the major access platforms. Mobile, enterprise, cable and traditional landline. In addition regulatory data indicates that North Americian¹s yack away on the phone more that any other region on Earth despite all the various communications options available. Again that is clearly because we have rational tariff structure unlike some areas <cough EU cough> that remain nameless. > >Right. The any to any model of E.164 named realtime communications still >works and works well and is still a great business. About 14 Billion in >the US BTW. You buy a lot with E.164 including the Emergency Services >networks 911 999 etc. I have had to listen to the naysayers in the IETF >hallways whine endlessly ..phone numbers are stupid the PSTN is toast etc. > <yawn> Now its SIP sucks WEBRTC is the future .. <snore> > > >>
- Re: Thoughts from IETF-92 correction Richard Shockey