Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-genarea-datatracker-community-06.txt> (Requirements for Internet-Draft Tracking by the IETF Community in the Datatracker) to Informational RFC

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Mon, 14 March 2011 21:44 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F1C3A6DA2 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.047, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_RED=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2y2mGHOiAGWN for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2F53A6A4B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dn3-177.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p2ELk30T010339 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:46:04 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-genarea-datatracker-community-06.txt> (Requirements for Internet-Draft Tracking by the IETF Community in the Datatracker) to Informational RFC
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <54309CC0-259E-4766-817F-35E2D11F150B@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:46:03 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <28D21647-E997-4A55-868C-E7C070ADB82D@nostrum.com>
References: <20110304224654.24845.31877.idtracker@localhost> <54309CC0-259E-4766-817F-35E2D11F150B@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: datatracker-reqmts@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:44:43 -0000

One additional thought -

How much would the list of attributes in 2.1.6 need to be expanded to make one of these user-defined lists
enough to satisfy the initial "Reporting Requirements" in section 4.3 of draft-ietf-genarea-datatracker-iana-rfced-extns-00?
Should we add the ability to match against the values (or absence of value) of a state for the various state machines tracked by the tracker?

RjS

On Mar 14, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:

> Paul -
> 
> 1) If we publish this as an RFC, note that imgur.com will only keep an image if it's viewed at least once every three months.
> 
> 2) In the list of things constituting an "update to an RFC", could you call out marking an RFC as Historic, and changing the
> maturity level of an RFC in place (such as was done for 5652)
> 
> 3) 2.1.2 talks of the ease of use to create a datatracker account. I think we have that already through the tools system.
> Are you thinking this will require the creation of a different system?
> 
> RjS
> 
> On Mar 4, 2011, at 4:46 PM, The IESG wrote:
> 
>> 
>> The IESG has received a request from the General Area Open Meeting WG
>> (genarea) to consider the following document:
>> - 'Requirements for Internet-Draft Tracking by the IETF Community in the
>>  Datatracker'
>> <draft-ietf-genarea-datatracker-community-06.txt> as an Informational
>> RFC
>> 
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2011-03-18. Exceptionally, comments may be
>> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
>> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>> 
>> The file can be obtained via
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-genarea-datatracker-community/
>> 
>> IESG discussion can be tracked via
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-genarea-datatracker-community/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>> _______________________________________________
>> IETF-Announce mailing list
>> IETF-Announce@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>