Re: W3C/IAB workshop on Strengthening the Internet Against Pervasive Monitoring (STRINT)

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Thu, 16 January 2014 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E3871ACC87 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:02:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XMZnnln_lOhE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:02:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oa0-x22f.google.com (mail-oa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8861AC404 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:02:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id m1so2272903oag.6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:02:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=UP+R6d/VKrXW+zCo/CNaqSN+ib9+DTO06FjNbUod0m8=; b=AfqkaPPWyW39+r+veSjgTzy7oH4ya91rYOqn+buvTaQ2Bd84UexLOCh3b16YCRz7kB HnW/COtQTKw5P5NB7QFgIEPS2R3OBxV6Gg+rodYgNUYoDlx1N43jxD9IsJah1CNsm8T2 RcwhWJnIkYfe7MmaIo4XvxAh+p+Ex+E308AS5gAUItZ9/xVJnDbGNcU1Rf4/Ntv0fLof 1wLudX7HH5fd+U2nVFhbOLyja44+SgfDreKuTND7jS/0dpzZ+y9o/y7raVmB2BrrqHeA tDuSJ1aJNX1q0HKFe6yaLWBfQndkYl0NKbmdawn/V4wYgb2VxDS5JH+Sp9ookGaM6uKx HrBQ==
X-Received: by 10.60.134.230 with SMTP id pn6mr157184oeb.40.1389902520321; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:02:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.48.9 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:01:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8972FC08-18D6-4B17-8E53-78E087D8E8BE@tzi.org>
References: <2CD9CC27-4F4E-4BBF-B428-768A23D82B79@iab.org> <52CEAA53.1090102@cs.tcd.ie> <52D7D63E.7010506@cs.tcd.ie> <52D80FAF.8040301@isdg.net> <8972FC08-18D6-4B17-8E53-78E087D8E8BE@tzi.org>
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 15:01:40 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPv4CP_5+UvPShKEoUVqDtMvg+7bm_tvS+ugvq0syofUOfAF8g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: W3C/IAB workshop on Strengthening the Internet Against Pervasive Monitoring (STRINT)
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b471e6aff0f4404f01be5aa"
Cc: IETF-Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 20:02:14 -0000

It was a response to the RTM Worm.


On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:

> On 16 Jan 2014, at 17:58, Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net> wrote:
>
> > The IETF has the ethics document RFC1087
>
> Whoa.
>
> — this is an IAB document, not an IETF document
> — it’s status is UNKNOWN
> — if it had been assigned a more specific status, that would be HISTORIC
> — it subject was about proper allocation of public resources for
> work-related activities:
>
> "there is widespread dependence on the Internet
> by its users for the support of day-to-day research activities.”
>
> "The U.S. Government sponsors of this system have a fiduciary
> responsibility to the public to allocate government resources wisely
> and effectively."
>
> etc.
>
> This is from a time where large parts of every-day human reality hadn’t
> moved into the digital domain (and thus into the Internet) yet.  In 1989,
> nobody would have thought about making the point that the integrity of the
> digital facets of your personality is the subject of a basic human right.
>  We are way beyond any question about that.
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
>