Re: [manet] Last Call: <draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-03.txt> (Security Threats for NHDP) to Informational RFC

[Abdussalam Baryun <[e-mail]>]

I would hope that IETF add my name in the acknowledgement section of the
I-D. I complained to AD about that my efforts in WGLC was not acknowledged
by editors even after my request, however, I did not stop reviewing (trying
not be discouraged) which I will complete on 6 June with the final
comments. Therefore, this message (can be added as a comment on the I-D) is
an objection to section 8 that ignores acknowledge input/review effort
related to the I-D.

AB


On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Ulrich Herberg <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Adrian,
>
> I personally agree that adding an informational ref to
> draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-sec is a good idea. I will discuss with my
> co-authors.
>
> Thanks
> Ulrich
>
>
> On Sunday, June 2, 2013, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>
>> Hi Abdussalam,
>>
>> I think it is a reasonable suggestion for this I-D to make a forward
>> reference
>> to draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-sec
>> Although this work is clearly scoped to NHDP (RFC 6130) as currently
>> specified,
>> it is worth an informational reference to note that there is work in
>> progress
>> that seeks to update NHDP to counter a number of security threats
>> described in
>> this document.
>>
>> I do not think, however, that this I-D should attempt to describe the
>> situation
>> with NHDP after the inclusion of protocol work that has not yet been
>> completed.
>> Contrary to your suggestion, I think this I-D motivates updates to 6130
>> and it
>> would be wrong to review this document in the context of changes being
>> made to
>> address this document.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Adrian
>>
>> > I think if we got an effort in IETF to update NHDP [RFC6130] as draft
>> > [1] does, why this reviewed I-D of threats does not include [1] in its
>> > references to be reviewed before reviewing this NHDP-threat I-D? I
>> > suggest to include draft [1] in References section, IMHO, any updates
>> > to RFC6130 should be considered by the community while reviewing this
>> > I-D.
>> >
>> > [1] draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-sec-02
>>
>>