RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-architecture-11

["Hutton, Andrew" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Russ,

Personally I can see that your suggested change to the text would result in more clarity.

I would be happy to make this change.

Regards
Andy




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ Housley [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: 03 January 2014 17:00
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-architecture-11
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-siprec-architecture-11
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review Date: 2014-01-03
> IETF LC End Date: 2013-10-01
> IESG Telechat date: 2014-01-09
> 
> Summary:
> 
> Thank you for addressing the issues raised in my previous review.
> This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.
> 
> Major Concerns:  None.
> 
> Minor Concerns:  None.
> 
> Editorial Comments:
> 
> The changes to Section 3.2.4 to resolve my earlier comment have
> introduced a clarity problem.  I suggest a minor rewording to fix it.
> 
> 3.2.4.  Media Stream Mixing
> 
>    In a basic session involving only audio there are typically two
>    audio/RTP streams between the two UAs involved transporting media in
>    each direction.  When recording this media, the two streams may be
>    mixed or not mixed at the SRC before being transmitted to the SRS.
>    In the case when they are not mixed, two separate streams are sent
>    to the SRS.  In the mixed case, a single mixed media stream is sent
>    to the SRS.  However, in the case when the media streams are not
>    mixed, the SDP offer sent to the SRS must describe two separate
>    media streams.