IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [AFS3-std] Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard

Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> Thu, 04 February 2010 21:05 UTC

Return-Path: <eagle@windlord.stanford.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7DE43A6CC4 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:05:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HVtn50dL3av3 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:05:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.stanford.edu (smtp5.Stanford.EDU [171.67.219.85]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BD13A6A4A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:05:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id AFC2918FFAB; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:06:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.67.225.134]) by smtp.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF81818FF6D; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:06:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CB261256BF; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:06:23 -0800 (PST)
From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: [AFS3-std] Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20100203223605.0904e8e8@resistor.net> (sm@resistor.net's message of "Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:34:52 -0800")
Organization: The Eyrie
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20100203223605.0904e8e8@resistor.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:06:23 -0800
Message-ID: <87pr4k7ltc.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:33:31 -0800
Cc: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@secure-endpoints.com>, afs3-standardization@openafs.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:05:38 -0000

SM <sm@resistor.net> writes:

> If it can cause operational problems, then the present text should be
> reworded.  I'll reuse text provided by Russ:

>    DNS SRV RRs, like all DNS RRs, have a time-to-live (TTL), after which
>    the SRV record information is no longer valid [RFC1034].  DNS RRs SHOULD
>    be discarded after their TTL, and the DNS query repeated.  This applies
>    to DNS SRV RRs for AFS as to any other DNS RR.  Any information derived
>    from the DNS SRV RRs, such as preference ranks, MUST be discarded when
>    the DNS SRV RR is expired.

> I moved the RFC 1034 reference to the first sentence in that paragraph.  I
> removed the "As specified in" to avoid any inference that the "should" in
> RFC 1034 has been elevated to a "SHOULD".

This looks great.  Thank you!  Adopted for the next version of the I-D.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email