IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IESG proposed statement on the IETF mission

"Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org> Mon, 27 October 2003 12:18 UTC

Received: from asgard.ietf.org (asgard.ietf.org [10.27.6.40]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA08985 for <ietf-web-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 07:18:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordomo by asgard.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.14) id 1AE63r-0002m7-Gq for ietf-list@asgard.ietf.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 07:01:27 -0500
Received: from ietf.org ([10.27.2.28]) by asgard.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1AE61P-0002kz-Op for ietf@asgard.ietf.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 06:58:55 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA08252 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 06:58:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AE61N-0003bI-00 for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 06:58:53 -0500
Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net ([216.148.227.85]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AE61M-0003aL-00 for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 06:58:52 -0500
Received: from dfnjgl21 (12-237-229-250.client.attbi.com[12.237.229.250]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP id <2003102711582301400nsntde> (Authid: sdawkins@comcast.net); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:58:23 +0000
Message-ID: <08fc01c39c81$a89d2110$0400a8c0@DFNJGL21>
Reply-To: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
To: ietf@ietf.org, problem-statement@alvestrand.no
References: <DADF50F5EC506B41A0F375ABEB320636BF6CF4@esebe023.ntc.nokia.com> <222713495.1067204653@[192.168.1.49]>
Subject: Re: IESG proposed statement on the IETF mission
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 05:58:38 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald@alvestrand.no>
>
> True. Nearly a year ago, we attempted to publish
> draft-iesg-vendor-extensions, to describe these problems in more
detail -
> but we failed to get that finished.

I should probably get out more, but I wasn't familiar with this draft.
I see that version 00 was announced. It looks to have been discussed
in a couple of posts on ccamp (and mpls? but I didn't look), and
revectored onto the main IETF discussion list, where it was the
subject of two posts. The draft says "The initial version of this
document was put together by the IESG", suggesting that they were
asking for input or other forms of help, but that didn't happen.

(In your opinion:) Was this a case of insufficient agreement, or a
case of insufficient cycles? Or something else?

Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email