Document Action: Selection and Operation of Secondary DNS Servers to BCP
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Thu, 17 July 1997 16:45 UTC
Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa11289; 17 Jul 97 12:45 EDT
Received: from ietf.ietf.org by ietf.org id aa11126; 17 Jul 97 12:41 EDT
To: IETF-Announce:;
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu>
Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@isi.edu>
Cc: namedroppers@internic.net
Sender: ietf-announce-request@ietf.org
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Document Action: Selection and Operation of Secondary DNS Servers to BCP
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 12:41:19 -0400
X-Orig-Sender: scoya@ietf.org
Message-ID: <9707171241.aa11126@ietf.org>
The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft "Selection and Operation of Secondary DNS Servers" <draft-ietf-dnsind-2ndry-06.txt> for publication as a Best Current Practices RFC. This document is the product of the DNS IXFR, Notification, and Dynamic Update Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Jeffrey Burgan and Thomas Narten. Technical Summary The Domain Name System (DNS) requires that multiple servers exist for every delegated domain (zone). A number of problems in DNS operations today are attributable to poor choices of secondary servers for DNS zones. The geographic placement as well as the diversity of network connectivity exhibited by the set of DNS servers for a zone can increase the reliability of that zone as well as improve overall network performance and access characteristics. This document discusses many of the issues that should be considered when selecting secondary servers for a zone. It offers guidance in how to best choose servers to serve a given zone. Both the physical and topological location of each server are material considerations when selecting secondary servers. The number of servers appropriate for a zone is also discussed, and some general secondary server maintenance issues are considered. Working Group Summary The Working Group last call produced no significant issues with this document. Protocol Quality This document has been reviewed by Jeffrey Burgan and Thomas Narten of the IESG.