IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D Action: draft-crocker-rfc2418bis-wgguidelines-01.txt

Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com> Thu, 29 October 2015 04:11 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516C31B438B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 21:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vA9wszP99m6W for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 21:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 631391B43A8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 21:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F96AF32A9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:11:22 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com
Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WrxcONrOx8Rd for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:11:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dhcp4.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.174]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D5E4AF329F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:11:22 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\))
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-crocker-rfc2418bis-wgguidelines-01.txt
From: Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <56315138.3090806@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:11:24 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C77B35CD-F025-4BD0-853E-93817886B79C@sobco.com>
References: <20150902014032.385.7539.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56315138.3090806@gmail.com>
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/LscG_OoG-oQMrSdQIIDHdYBkI6Q>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 04:11:28 -0000

imo - any document that updates an existing document (especially technical standards and process documents)
needs to include a section that says what the differences are between the old version and the new version so
that readers can find out what they need to do differently than they have been doing

I do not see such a section in this document

Scott

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status