RE: Dedicated list for technical discussions
"Glen Zorn" <gwz@net-zen.net> Sun, 29 August 2010 08:12 UTC
Return-Path: <gwz@net-zen.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6699A3A67ED for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 01:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.99
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.609, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v0YSvlbr+G5J for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 01:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpauth22.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpauth22.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1229F3A67E3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 01:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 2852 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2010 08:12:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (110.164.136.213) by smtpauth22.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.44) with ESMTP; 29 Aug 2010 08:12:47 -0000
From: Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>
To: 'Mark Nottingham' <mnot@mnot.net>
References: <CB2A0C4E-247D-4C82-A947-26F2EBF069F2@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CB2A0C4E-247D-4C82-A947-26F2EBF069F2@mnot.net>
Subject: RE: Dedicated list for technical discussions
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:12:31 +0700
Organization: Network Zen
Message-ID: <001101cb4751$ef54b460$cdfe1d20$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: ActHFm33w/bZPpmVS7iRyrAxw8eH9wAOoqRg
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: 'IETF discussion list' <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 08:12:19 -0000
Mark Nottingham [mailto://mnot@mnot.net] writes: > I know it's been brought up many times before, but I'd appreciate a > separate list for technical discussions regarding drafts, etc., since > this list seems to have become a travel tips forum. I'm sure that if you have some specific technical topics to discuss at least some of us would be willing to join in. I must note, however, that your own posts to this list over the last month or so have been about the Maastrict venue, IETF Logo wear and this complaint (not exactly rocket science ;-). ...
- Dedicated list for technical discussions Mark Nottingham
- RE: Dedicated list for technical discussions Glen Zorn
- Re: Dedicated list for technical discussions Mark Nottingham
- Re: Dedicated list for technical discussions Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: Dedicated list for technical discussions Dave Cridland
- Re: Dedicated list for technical discussions Scott Brim
- RE: Dedicated list for technical discussions Randall Gellens
- Re: Dedicated list for technical discussions Melinda Shore
- Re: Dedicated list for technical discussions Cullen Jennings