IETF Logo Mail Archive

"Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 26 March 2015 16:20 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F88B1A8885 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S2J3ytXTQ9H1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x232.google.com (mail-la0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E290D1A8888 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by labto5 with SMTP id to5so49919799lab.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+IbZh65D4chK0DfoOHUozXFj0RMEViWu/Cp2GmPqOpA=; b=PGxM1VyU3SFGpMkGNnSzjHb0EGJXoG47qW959c0yfs872XIZZBdziDIfkRrxv2F5Gq DqFd4Ln78Pm8KhIC1s4NxoIWOHqD8lgbJFP5s59m0yVwqgVtaC6sHUuTjAqACwgiPmkL wi9KhVdGir7LAi/w3FOTfnExZ9k9qXUPUJU4jrTY3qdU7HmftYursQ7aP7rNzR3YXEFh c9WhhPoXcvjtyslhLTy4keY1FnBCH9xeen/6xj9EGYmxRRj6yX4hDxVafLbNHyUIIUNl A/NJnAbZ9/kdbMO8BIlS53cmptarIzRZwMLcqboslI+hkAGg8AOgYsoXkGsJMB3GgRU6 LVgw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.205.1 with SMTP id lc1mr13872820lac.51.1427386844465; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.129.193 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:20:44 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-cjQgvuGkwFvCu5ELQEw9sbrYhVMP+xgujcKPLps7VRJg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: David Black <david.black@emc.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113369e8d24f6805123365e4"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/N_y0CncLMCECaMykAenl6O0T07Q>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:20:54 -0000

Hi, David,

You mentioned "per-AD" at the Admin Plenary open mike last night, and I
wanted to make sure I understood your point.

I think you were pointing to the ballot display on
https://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/agenda/documents/, where there is a box
for each AD to ballot on each document, and suggesting that maybe balloting
for each area on each document might would work about as well, giving
equivalent coverage while reducing the review load on each AD (except Jari,
of course - there being only one GEN AD).

Does that sound familiar?

Thanks,

Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email