Re: What problems does the draft cut-off solve? ...
sob@harvard.edu (Scott Bradner) Wed, 02 March 2005 13:16 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA08610; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 08:16:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D6Tjl-00005e-85; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:18:02 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D6Tga-0004bq-VF; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:14:44 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D6TgZ-0004bl-4g for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:14:43 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA08388 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 08:14:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from newdev.eecs.harvard.edu ([140.247.60.212] helo=newdev.harvard.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D6Thh-0008VA-Rd for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:15:55 -0500
Received: by newdev.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 501) id BCEDD241366; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 08:14:27 -0500 (EST)
To: ietf@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20050302131427.BCEDD241366@newdev.harvard.edu>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:14:27 -0500
From: sob@harvard.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d
Cc: Harald@alvestrand.no
Subject: Re: What problems does the draft cut-off solve? ...
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 97adf591118a232206bdb5a27b217034
> At this point, less than one week before the meeting, only 14 WGs > (not counting BOFs) have agendas posted. humm - maybe there is another explanation for part of that I sent an agenda (including ID names) in almost a month ago but its not on the WG & BOF agenda page ========forwarded message============= >From sob Mon Feb 7 21:09:58 2005 To: agenda@ietf.org Subject: agenda for newtrk newtrk working group agenda intro & status - chair 10 report and discussion on the anti-cruft effort 40 background reading: draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00.txt discussion of ISD proposal 60 background reading: draft-ietf-newtrk-repurposing-isd-01.txt draft-ietf-newtrk-sample-isd-00.txt draft-ietf-newtrk-sd-00.txt draft-ietf-newtrk-sample-isd-stdproc-00.txt wrapup - chair 10 _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: What problems does the draft cut-off solve? .… Scott Bradner