IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Yang update from IESG ?

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 19 November 2019 09:48 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B557120854; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 01:48:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 94cfiG6i785U; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 01:48:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D40FA1200CE; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 01:48:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xAJ9jXYH028274; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 09:48:40 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=Rl2jNCVno0Nb7xuazYwoI6T86O2cynkBzyyG9QygOuc=; b=VDeqLxXEh7AuiB7s/0UlbjKm7mkFoMQV5gS5QNIaUtFaXawAGOSt4Y1hHG8e5r3oL3sj io1zzBTVJwY3LeFknXtQ4Rffv5Y/SoOCNPvFkl/SmTuVJdPjgyIAKRc9H0g0r/9gcZNo OJxkKvWJWxgRe3NsorVOtEo5dsrJyI0jT0uNXg/VNShh/EnPVPgQ0nvgHNTsRKyipcbn uEckQeD3iZg1s/mvifnjboC20L6csf2/Oj3VDBhPjYM902kX1YpaTbfozcuHdZdL/V/Y Hr6AsaqtZ7uyd6eaN7h0LnMVhaNh2i+ljENF7qyRtiDpcUm6DxSY6D2A31qilDGaoGzp HQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18] (may be forged)) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2wafywcpmr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 09:48:39 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xAJ9lakr007152; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 04:48:38 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.34]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2wadayrtv9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 04:48:38 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 04:48:37 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 04:48:37 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Subject: Re: Yang update from IESG ?
Thread-Topic: Yang update from IESG ?
Thread-Index: AQHVndb7DeILFLDSXkeSBkv4Fv6aRaeTG0WA
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 09:48:36 +0000
Message-ID: <7927A525-EC80-43ED-BC93-35199A2BC6DE@akamai.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911131435240.22669@bofh.nohats.ca> <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01E70B0061@marchand> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911180102380.9256@bofh.nohats.ca> <10541.1574083581@dooku.sandelman.ca> <e745d480c113b09eb4f6761cf48ef1e997fc3e6c.camel@nic.cz> <00e901d59ebe$1cdb3300$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <00e901d59ebe$1cdb3300$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1f.0.191110
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.218.224]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <20F69A856D31714AB94FABDD4A780C3B@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-11-19_02:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=691 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-1911190093
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-11-19_02:2019-11-15,2019-11-19 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=660 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1911190092
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/O36wPkfp449mGYyA6WLsmOvEbbA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 09:48:54 -0000

>    In fact, this practice, of having IANA maintain modules, goes back to at
    least RFC2677 in August 1999 so I would expect any troubles to have come
    to light by now.
  
Scaling could expose problems not noticed when it's onesie-twosies.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email