RE: Re: Last Call2: An Echo Function for ISO 8473 to Draft Standard
"Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (LJO2/I4, +1 508 486 2358) 26-Apr-1993 1613" <dee@ranger.enet.dec.com> Mon, 26 April 1993 20:13 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22083; 26 Apr 93 16:13 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22077; 26 Apr 93 16:13 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12190; 26 Apr 93 16:13 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22067; 26 Apr 93 16:13 EDT
Received: from inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22063; 26 Apr 93 16:13 EDT
Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA10832; Mon, 26 Apr 93 13:13:44 -0700
Received: by us1rmc.bb.dec.com; id AA07845; Mon, 26 Apr 93 16:11:41 -0400
Message-Id: <9304262011.AA07845@us1rmc.bb.dec.com>
Received: from ranger.enet; by us1rmc.enet; Mon, 26 Apr 93 16:11:42 EDT
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1993 16:11:42 -0400
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (LJO2/I4, +1 508 486 2358) 26-Apr-1993 1613" <dee@ranger.enet.dec.com>
To: craig@aland.bbn.com
Cc: iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, ietf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, iesg@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Apparently-To: iesg@ietf.cnri.reston.va.us, ietf@cnri.reston.va.us, iesg-secretary@cnri.reston.va.us, craig@aland.bbn.com
Subject: RE: Re: Last Call2: An Echo Function for ISO 8473 to Draft Standard
Why an ISO standard instead of an IETF standard? Why not continue the normal IETF process but also sent it through to ISO. Certainly there are cases where US/ANSI standards have also been made international standards. Donald -------------- From: US1RMC::"craig@aland.bbn.com" "Craig Partridge" 26-APR-1993 15:56 To: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> CC: IETF@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, IESG <IESG@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>, noop@merit.edu Subj: Re: Last Call2: An Echo Function for ISO 8473 to Draft Standard Hi folks: Odd thought. Rather than making this an IETF standard, why not see if the suggested ISO-IETF liaisons work, by sending this to ISO, with an explanation of why it is needed and request that it be blessed. Essentially a dry run of the sort of process that we'd like to see if TUBA is adopted. Craig
- Last Call2: An Echo Function for ISO 8473 to Draf… IESG Secretary
- Last Call2: An Echo Function for ISO 8473 to Draf… Dave Katz
- Re: Last Call2: An Echo Function for ISO 8473 to … Craig Partridge
- RE: Re: Last Call2: An Echo Function for ISO 8473… Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (LJO2/I4, +1 508 486 2358) 26-Apr-1993 1613
- Re: Last Call2: An Echo Function for ISO 8473 to … Vinton G. Cerf