Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt

Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> Tue, 03 July 2007 16:35 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5lLi-0005OT-AP; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:35:34 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5lLg-0005OK-F1 for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:35:32 -0400
Received: from shu.cs.utk.edu ([160.36.56.39]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5lKm-0004oN-Mg for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:35:32 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shu.cs.utk.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7AA1EE242; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:34:36 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new with ClamAV and SpamAssasin at cs.utk.edu
Received: from shu.cs.utk.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bes.cs.utk.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1bM5cXDw+VWQ; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:34:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lust.indecency.org (user-119b1dm.biz.mindspring.com [66.149.133.182]) by shu.cs.utk.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342901EE214; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:34:35 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <468A7A9A.5070803@cs.utk.edu>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:34:34 -0400
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Macintosh/20070604)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
References: <20070703145113.68830872D9@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20070703145113.68830872D9@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1
OpenPGP: id=E1473978
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Noel Chiappa wrote:
>     > From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
>
>     > This is the time when everyone should be running dual stack.
>
> So, what lesson(s) ought the IETF to take away from the fact that people
> aren't?
>   
people will nearly always choose a quick fix that adds complexity over a
fix that has better long-term viability but is more disruptive. 
especially if the latter requires them to change how they think.  few
people are flexible enough to change how they think.  the only way
people in general change is to be replaced by younger people.

the problem is exacerbated because the more people invest in complexity,
the harder it is to replace whatever marginal functionality is provided
by that extra complexity.  IPv6 was designed in a day where IPv4
security problems were still minimal.  meanwhile, IPv4 enterprise
networks have acquired all manner of security baggage.  those products
just  barely exist for IPv6, if at all, and they're not proven yet.  
even enterprises that want to adopt IPv6 because they understand its
advantages find it somewhat difficult.



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf