Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-core-coap-tcp-tls-07

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 10 May 2017 04:31 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332DD12EAB2; Tue, 9 May 2017 21:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mE7caBuZxXjE; Tue, 9 May 2017 21:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9204A1205F1; Tue, 9 May 2017 21:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v4A4V8ZY025040; Wed, 10 May 2017 06:31:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p5DC7F3A7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.199.243.167]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3wN3G45Wt8zDHmm; Wed, 10 May 2017 06:31:08 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-core-coap-tcp-tls-07
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <767F913A-586B-42A2-B021-F9AC5C478702@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 06:31:07 +0200
Cc: art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-core-coap-tcp-tls.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, core@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 516083467.066919-e7cf67f9e5bffe784973075c0e683012
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2D57FF92-3A56-43BC-A815-27801E31F770@tzi.org>
References: <149179722452.3118.982908107963516290@ietfa.amsl.com> <5E5238DC-B835-4BDF-B50D-8D594A46C4D4@tzi.org> <767F913A-586B-42A2-B021-F9AC5C478702@mnot.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/OwqQuIXK3g9_HIfzxTxI1yJieJc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 04:31:15 -0000

> On May 9, 2017, at 23:30, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> To close this loop -- the change in -08 isn't sufficiently prominent IME; while the general nature of the change is listed in the Abstract, the actual normative text is very hard to find.

Certainly, let’s see what the IESG decides here.

> Given that this is a pretty fundamental change in the operation of a URI scheme, I'd think it at least deserves its own section, if not a separate document.

I don’t agree that this is such a fundamental change here — the /.well-known name space in the URI already was special (by the fact that ws URIs are mapped to http URIs, which do have /.well-known reserved already).

But that doesn’t matter, we should find the best editorial way to document making the well-known URI concept available to WebSocket URIs.

Grüße, Carsten