Re: I-D "Unwritten Rules and Values of the IETF" (Mentoring)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 16 December 2015 20:13 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F47C1A8978 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:13:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uwsWFsM9qPuw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:13:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BE331A8972 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:13:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-x232.google.com with SMTP id q3so8940535pav.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:13:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+fkcT6AG8A0cRuz/XGIdnjWuIBY4CkoxR9z4sJG4Qkg=; b=panMPEOAgy52YDrhNfI02++Ajzd/vB43laqRVAzFd5vIZ6Vl36CJPvOEbNnjFQV5Q+ g4EevgNleMlGbtX4/mfDCkbs2f/VRhX4HHctVMnYGdTF9eweNSf8g1RA/Y0H3EUDY1Zu SEui2GuHvWI6Hy8C5Fb1IS+i0bI62oOuLncU7PR9owVm/oSXs5Ft+mR8xLkJ5a3XDJ2a ciJ2I2Lyqsz91VVdRMvA1EQhORcOQFgcY0E/iCUjnp865NA/a2WxSPzq41Pe5qKJnEzq r/y6GDnGtl3YAsY2o+Zx7hYcwSnZrKKkwQPUwkV8avCqFfME5IKaDCcTPNZP5/qVMSvK jBOA==
X-Received: by 10.66.116.81 with SMTP id ju17mr59588834pab.59.1450296834916; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:13:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:7363:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:7363:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w72sm6611528pfi.75.2015.12.16.12.13.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:13:50 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: I-D "Unwritten Rules and Values of the IETF" (Mentoring)
To: Thiago Marinello <thiago@marinello.eng.br>, nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com
References: <274389076.1305764.1450204169930.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <274389076.1305764.1450204169930.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <CAPzJMbWUigdGfAGCxDwDD3UU5aKT33Bqud1uVMY21N9D4gOqYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <5671C602.5000503@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:13:54 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPzJMbWUigdGfAGCxDwDD3UU5aKT33Bqud1uVMY21N9D4gOqYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/P9_GNi_VV2HN2-svvFg2hxJ34Oc>
Cc: IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 20:13:56 -0000

On 17/12/2015 06:34, Thiago Marinello wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:29 PM,  <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com> wrote:
>> I have just posted an I-D "Unwritten Rules and Values of the IETF".
> 
> Initially I thought that the TAO of IETF has already addressed all
> typical questions for a newcomer, but reading the draft I realized
> that this idea is great. This kind of information will be very helpful
> for new IETF participants.

Which brings up a question I was meaning to ask anyway: once this is done,
should we actually incorporate it in the Tao? (The Tao is a community
document that happens to be maintained as a web page instead of an RFC,
so we could certainly decide to do this.)

Glancing at the Tao, it needs an update anyway (obsolete references etc.)

> I suggest publish the final version of this document in other
> languages (like Portuguese, Spanish and others) the same way did with
> TAO. I'd like to help with this.

Good idea.

   Brian

> 
> __
>  Thiago Marinello
> 
>