IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DRUMS]

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Mon, 23 August 2010 11:52 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6173A6869 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 04:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.041
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.041 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yDuSz0OpUWSW for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 04:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail129.messagelabs.com (mail129.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83EC83A69F8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 04:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: tony@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-129.messagelabs.com!1282564405!19668548!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.145]
Received: (qmail 17102 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2010 11:53:25 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp6.sbc.com (HELO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.145) by server-11.tower-129.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 23 Aug 2010 11:53:25 -0000
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7NBrf9M032676 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:53:41 -0400
Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7NBrckg032660 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:53:38 -0400
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7NBrMOH031797 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:53:22 -0400
Received: from mailgw1.maillennium.att.com (mailgw1.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7NBrFCe031743 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:53:15 -0400
Received: from [135.70.254.66] (vpn-135-70-254-66.vpn.east.att.com[135.70.254.66]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20100823115314gw100s4pvre> (Authid: tony); Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:53:15 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.254.66]
Message-ID: <4C726129.7070901@att.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:53:13 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "t.petch" <daedulus@btconnect.com>
Subject: Re: [DRUMS]
References: <D0D55E45-8686-41B5-B804-CD535B8CE0C7@americafree.tv> <012a01cb3253$ab7a8980$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <000a01cb429b$53c6e960$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <000a01cb429b$53c6e960$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:52:57 -0000

If you look at diffs from draft-chandhok-listid-04.txt, you'll find that 
the reference name got updated in the References section, but the 
references themselves within the text did not.

     Tony

On 8/23/2010 4:15 AM, t.petch wrote:
> RFC2919 makes reference to [DRUMS] for some of its ABNF  but I see no sign of
> DRUMS in its references (nor is there a relevant erratum).
>
> Would that be what became RFC2822?
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email