Genart telechat review of draft-jones-cose-rsa-03

Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Mon, 22 May 2017 04:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393D912956B; Sun, 21 May 2017 21:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-jones-cose-rsa.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Genart telechat review of draft-jones-cose-rsa-03
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.51.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <149542590419.3467.434051460088011243@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 21:05:04 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/PHtSw1OSIOhbsAHNa1hPFqQpCRI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 04:05:04 -0000

Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-jones-cose-rsa-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2017-05-21
IETF LC End Date: 2017-06-15
IESG Telechat date: 2017-06-22

Summary: The document is ready for publication as standard track RFC
with nits

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments: 

1. Section 3 first paragraph "can be find" should be "can be found"

2. IANA 5.1  table 1 and 2 missing recommended colum

3. IANA 5.3 table 4 the title is not "value" but "label"