RE: [VPIM] GSM 6.10 is public domain; audio/wav needs registered
"Glenn Parsons" <gparsons@nortelnetworks.com> Thu, 16 November 2000 18:30 UTC
Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id NAA19236 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 13:30:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smtprch2.nortel.com (smtprch2.nortelnetworks.com [192.135.215.15]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id NAA17328 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 13:25:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from zrchb213.us.nortel.com (actually zrchb213) by smtprch2.nortel.com; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 12:16:58 -0600
Received: by zrchb213.us.nortel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2652.35) id <W57YT185>; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 12:21:10 -0600
Message-ID: <488891341182D4118A870000F80822E782B700@zcard00p.ca.nortel.com>
From: Glenn Parsons <gparsons@nortelnetworks.com>
To: vpim@lists.neystadt.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [VPIM] GSM 6.10 is public domain; audio/wav needs registered
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 12:21:02 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2652.35)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C04FF9.F9E50240"
X-Orig: <gparsons@americasm01.nt.com>
X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org
FYI, In the VPIM WG, for IVM we are interested in the MS-GSM codec. It is different enough from GSM 6.10 for Microsoft to hold a patent. It is some sort of patent release statement (as well as an accurate definition) from Microsoft on MG-GSM and WAVE (audio/wav) that we have been waiting for. Note that we have been waiting for a while and at the last meeting the consensus was that G.711 (as in audio/basic) would be the alternative should we decide that we have waited long enough. Cheers, Glenn. > ---------- > From: James P. Salsman > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 3:03 pm > To: vpim@lists.neystadt.org > Cc: ietf@ietf.org > Subject: [VPIM] GSM 6.10 is public domain; audio/wav needs registered > > Contrary to what people at VPIM meetings, lists, and on web pages > have suggested, nobody owns any IPR on the GSM 06.10 vocodec format, > or on any routines for encoding or decoding it. It was developed > from published code by people who took care to publish it before it > could be monopolized. > > Philips owns the rights to a related but different form of LPC, > from U.S. patent 5,943,646, which was applied for more than four > years after the publication of GSM 06.10 by ETSI. That patent is > most likely what is confusing people about the status. > > Also, http://www.ema.org/vpimdir/specs/draft-ema-vpim-wav-00.txt > -- the pending-in-limbo audio/wav IANA registration -- has an error: > it reads "audio/vnd.wav"; that should be "audio/vnd.wave", which, > by the way, hasn't been registered with IANA either. I agree with > Keith Moore that they should be registered as identical, and I hope > that they be registered in the same document to make that clearer. > The definitive reference for these formats seems to be kept in > Microsoft's Support Knowledge Base Article ID Q120253: > http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q120/2/53.asp > > Cheers, > James > > >
- GSM 6.10 is public domain; audio/wav needs regist… James P. Salsman
- Re: [VPIM] GSM 6.10 is public domain; audio/wav n… Jutta Degener
- Re: [VPIM] GSM 6.10 is public domain; audio/wav n… James P. Salsman
- RE: [VPIM] GSM 6.10 is public domain; audio/wav n… Eric Burger
- RE: [VPIM] GSM 6.10 is public domain; audio/wav n… Glenn Parsons
- RE: [VPIM] GSM 6.10 is public domain; audio/wav n… Caleb Clausen