IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-13.txt> (IETF Plenary Meeting Venue Selection Process) to Best Current Practice

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 20 April 2018 05:11 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02094128959; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 22:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rwze4lDNma-n; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 22:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F59F127867; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 22:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2631; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1524201062; x=1525410662; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=YDXcjY4PVxxYKAT4YfpNJOLaggO+U2Rx1CRV4X/WpCo=; b=MxgHLuKMJPu3hWkaWdFdPGlKqGZvrukA7LKAExMvg5DE3Zr3X6Wl5OB2 4i2+CJJjP7M533Msvd6ju+jomE2aryXerg8LabxP28seEoCLSuv3JaoSW 82wJoTkQqzmHYIRrbScuLdP7jeEPNKFk28SjAwqAD2PrmrHU0rOkzlhW4 8=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C+AACpddla/xbLJq1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYUdhBKIAl6NZCmBD5JzgXgIA4RpAoJiNBgBAgEBAQEBAQJsKIUjAQUjVhALDgojBwICVwYNCAEBhQmnKIIciEKCGg+KGYEPI4Joh3OCVAKXbQiDO4FQiSwGgSaGI4UEkCeBJRw4gVIzGggbFYJ/gkeOCD2QAgEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.49,300,1520899200"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="3253268"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Apr 2018 05:10:58 +0000
Received: from [10.61.210.138] ([10.61.210.138]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w3K5AvRL030109; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 05:10:57 GMT
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-13.txt> (IETF Plenary Meeting Venue Selection Process) to Best Current Practice
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, mtgvenue@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <152295912877.25912.6342932952771014700.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D3770265-4153-434D-B82E-D66655A93B97@vigilsec.com> <691538B3-CC94-4C68-BD5D-D5193109AD56@qti.qualcomm.com> <67807CDE-52FB-4713-A7F2-9B184555FE7B@vigilsec.com> <90792b83-b239-14b6-dc4f-df19c63fe4b4@cisco.com> <2B6C4B2A-F167-4332-8534-FFE7EC72E08B@vigilsec.com> <5ac6cbad-2435-f0cb-7f6a-4f57cc0d01a3@cisco.com> <8D0B6FB9-A8C8-4E9A-A12C-C4169C80EC2C@qti.qualcomm.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=lear@cisco.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsBNBFMe1UQBCADdYOS5APDpIpF2ohAxB+nxg1GpAYr8iKwGIb86Wp9NkK5+QwbW9H035clT lpVLciExtN8E3MCTPOIm7aITPlruixAVwlBY3g7U9eRppSw9O2H/7bie2GOnYxqmsw4v1yNZ 9NcMLlD8raY0UcQ5r698c8JD4xUTLqybZXaK2sPeJkxzT+IwupRSQ+vXEvFFGhERQ88zo5Ca Sa1Gw/Rv54oH0Dq2XYkO41rhxQ60BKZLZuQK1d9+1y3I+An3AJeD3AA31fJZD3H8YRKOBgqe ILPILbw1mM7gCtCjfvFCt6AFCwEsjITGx55ceoQ+t5B5XGYJEppMWsIFrwZsfbL+gP31ABEB AAHNJUVsaW90IExlYXIgPGxlYXJAb2Zjb3Vyc2VpbXJpZ2h0LmNvbT7CwHsEEwECACUCGwMG CwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheABQJTHtXCAhkBAAoJEIe2a0bZ0nozBNoH/j0Mdnyg CgNNmI4DyL9mGfTJ/+XiTxWXMK4TTszwwn/tsXjyPQWjoO6nYqz5i96ItmSpkelSGVpzU+LK LQxSjFeUvKw23bp1rVecfGR+OENSE1m6KfFj3vtzQOZ2/FgK210MWnlYNNyAHX6Pf6hKInTP v6LbZiAQMCmf0aPvRbk/aPSNJAuIKrLrrCgAlwelrTavFsSwnKI3dhSG8DJ9+z/uiXDiHYra Ub3BKp5K/x71Zd8hUsWm2simnE/6HvZaZz7CC29JSZ/5gGtNB3OMNKLzLWUbQacF3IKxpW66 ZFYFYnlBV4jRnKlmb40YcEXWVJkkVC8g+/J9Qo6R8BdmSTXOwE0EUx7VRAEIALRZXth1u/3n FgY+G2FN0KEEik+2Xsk8JX9zr/eISa+Ol8a4U1orgxpyP2V7bQQDkDUEfs+Asagc6I8zrk3K xGln3pFFVfdM18uaEYwWvmE84Y12r7FwYdW62bA9X1Ttsp5Q1GI8XHdh0SQTF12pXYTwWW1P THYVIp7bGzM88cHqBW0xyRflu4j2nUrd9tWFd28SRxhj+MHQkQkbKFLloRty3lwdS8MCRPzX 9gUrkl+DxFHC7WrW3Vi4glI5YBlD0n2hSyDoP1GkKVT60gUGh7eJOnUBR8lzKm5wYqAtgq2m 79rKBylA40diRhbnTTeY+ytqMWFF5UXm97Jwxsezi7kAEQEAAcLAXwQYAQIACQUCUx7VRAIb DAAKCRCHtmtG2dJ6M5K5CADbunatgHsqHbR3KbpXxzralakEcdODGv/fbN6/EdKJeXrG9QKD lPxZTB9STw6+ANwESsr9uUMAxdDNKDeynjnQmFHxGdcdcXlnPZPThfseeUhUkbB/YKOfDIQA kKozNoKYj6Dcia+D/wvifIEW+GUUcO/6Qi8yK6PLJyM8C7vHEqmUGzX8gTCYOgAyOd4WZrC9 95CfB0yFIorw+MpK7MZTm5SbGPcYF9Gq9MzSqmaEw8U6YOElKYfnkcsCTLYyWaolhck+3/0R 9ISEWK5rUzqAuK40S4+Sn7yNycdCoqvQh4e3xSpzAu3aYZ8jKXQVV0X2G9Y+M1HMZuCqhPUO LTdF
Message-ID: <2309f31b-3a7a-39df-2dda-e0f26ef0ced6@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 07:10:57 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8D0B6FB9-A8C8-4E9A-A12C-C4169C80EC2C@qti.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y5YROCfo7eWol6Gh7SetoS7VVPJWocXv0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/PnoNQ_tPKCD9uhc0yyGZbvUfisw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 05:11:04 -0000


On 19.04.18 22:16, Pete Resnick wrote:
> On 18 Apr 2018, at 1:37, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
>> Assuming nobody has an objection, I've updated my local editor's copy to
>> include a normative reference (I don't think it matters which it is in
>> this case, but at least the RFC Editor will group the two docs).
>
> That makes sense to me.

Oops!  Except that if the IESG really has serious concerns about the the
other document (and it seems that at least one member does), I'd just
assume leave the reference informational.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email