Re: Protocol Action: 'IKEv2 Fragmentation' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation-10.txt)

[Kathleen Moriarty <[e-mail]>]

Hi Randy,

Sorry, this was my fault.  I have a question into the secretariat to see if
I can fix this as it was part of the ballot text.  I was checking on the
number of implementations and forgot to go back and update with the answer,
none.

If I can add text, it will note that the working group reached consensus
and that there are no implementations yet.  That would be followed with the
text from the shepherd report:

The WG discussion of the document was fairly good, with about average
participation (which
for the IPsecME WG means "the chairs had to beg a bit for more
participants, but we then got
them"). We also got a "TSVDIR-ish review" of the draft, which got good
discussion on the
list. There was a reasonable amount of give-and-take, and the WG Last Call
was uncontentious.
A significant point was brought up during IETF Last Call, and was added to
the Security
Considerations.

Best regards,
Kathleen


On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Randy Presuhn <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Hi -
> >From: The IESG <[e-mail]>
> >Sent: Sep 2, 2014 3:04 PM
> >To: IETF-Announce <[e-mail]>
> >Cc: ipsecme mailing list <[e-mail]>, ipsecme chair <
> [e-mail]>, RFC Editor <[e-mail]>
> >Subject: Protocol Action: 'IKEv2 Fragmentation' to Proposed Standard
> (draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation-10.txt)
> ...
> >Document Quality
> >
> >   Are there existing implementations of the protocol?  Have a
> >   significant number of vendors indicated their plan to
> >   implement the specification?  Are there any reviewers that
> >   merit special mention as having done a thorough review,
> >   e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a
> >   conclusion that the document had no substantive issues?  If
> >   there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review,
> >   what was its course (briefly)?  In the case of a Media Type
> >   Review, on what date was the request posted?
>
> It would have been nice if the announcement had included
> answers to these questions.
>
> Randy
>
>


-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen