IETF Logo Mail Archive

Standards and patents

Samir Srivastava <samirs.lists@gmail.com> Wed, 27 July 2011 06:07 UTC

Return-Path: <samirs.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F090C21F8AD3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C4CHqfc863C6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f53.google.com (mail-pz0-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5790521F8A1A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6so2006718pzk.26 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XLbjXyq6ByDtTEaVeJaqG2EVdhpdZ+Zy0M9X92f9UKs=; b=wq2NV0gzgSt12Ybd3DwMJt13xN31gL34hX3KlRGqev+HxCcJy/sK1ggLGVSg0MjAbn JKA9hbkvUdK+J+esMUaS2eFAnrHz9gWAkvxe3qeQ8Zn/+rRrCmo5C7GuaAw8/xy91XSR GVKxwt78tLilBXFYCL1CyjolPryP0qUNOum6c=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.11.232 with SMTP id t8mr7875685pbb.234.1311746853768; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.43.7 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:07:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK+SpiyJYKKuWo5bzn_a9+KwW_SFhFXKT34_VTW3b3LKgxa_ag@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Standards and patents
From: Samir Srivastava <samirs.lists@gmail.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 06:07:35 -0000

Hi, Refer http://samirsrivastava.typepad.com for posting on Standards
And Patents. Copyright of posting on Standards And Patents is free for
personal usage. Arguments were presented in favour of that standards
and their usage should be free from patents. If standards are
patentable then mathematical / scientific theories ( innovation of the
perfection level) should be patentable also. IMHO after the
development of the baseline specifications we lack freedom to
standardize best. Standards are developed by community & for
community. There is no role of patent hunters in that. Comments /
flames on the blog or here are welcome. Regards Samir

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email