RE: [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-iasa2-consolidated-upd-07

Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com> Tue, 09 April 2019 06:10 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9343912074E; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 23:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W9BXj36Jfwhh; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 23:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E66E12075A; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 23:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 530524F0837DF017DB2E; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 07:10:02 +0100 (IST)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 07:10:02 +0100
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:09:53 +0800
From: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
To: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-iasa2-consolidated-upd.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-iasa2-consolidated-upd.all@ietf.org>, "iasa20@ietf.org" <iasa20@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-iasa2-consolidated-upd-07
Thread-Topic: [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-iasa2-consolidated-upd-07
Thread-Index: AQHU7oRVCF1VxFixd0u0NJRWBsW/nKYzV/1g
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 06:09:52 +0000
Message-ID: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B929993B71E@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <155478050533.30160.2682229477519742277@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155478050533.30160.2682229477519742277@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.143.247]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Q7QK40ft4a2HL9cxJr84R7IcNgA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 06:10:07 -0000

Sorry for the mistake. Review result: Ready.

Sheng

-----Original Message-----
From: OPS-DIR [mailto:ops-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sheng Jiang via Datatracker
Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 11:28 AM
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-iasa2-consolidated-upd.all@ietf.org; iasa20@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-iasa2-consolidated-upd-07

Reviewer: Sheng Jiang
Review result: Ready

Reviewer: Sheng Jiang
Review result: Has Issues

Hi, OPS-DIR, Authors,

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

This BCP document provides updates to several position titles by IETF 
   Administrative Support Activity 2.0 (IASA2.0)  structure, and organizational 
   relationships that are referenced elsewhere, and   deprecates some now-obsolete 
   documents to ensure that there is no confusion due to these changes. It is clear 
   and well written. It is ready for publication.

Major issue: no.

Minor issue: no.

Regards,

Sheng

_______________________________________________
OPS-DIR mailing list
OPS-DIR@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-dir