Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop-05
"Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com> Tue, 08 October 2013 22:13 UTC
Return-Path: <sajassi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51AD921F9EDA; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_LIST=2.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2d4u0p7RKS0z; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768E421F9D96; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1482; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1381270416; x=1382480016; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=nQVM/GPbpLvRWm2fnXW/nNB7WpHdGJd/Ktkvt3j6Q+Y=; b=jjYs6W4QVPR8mD6rLCsreWZ+le7QviD6h/NJlNmvsciN0zj8EemDef6E m4RegzjVkwgbVUfVdQd3zz+vtzGFCM9NFSp3gUKm9w7CJye5TO8xaPCPK 9Apyhs72GB7nB0FwAV5ohALdJVX3Z2uffLD2obO/lr0mPGp9sQA95YewX A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah4FAMeCVFKtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABZgmYhOFLBKYEmFnSCJwEEeRIBCBQOViUCBAENBQiHfgELui+PETEHgx+BBAOMUYxfhgKKT4Mkgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,1059,1371081600"; d="scan'208";a="269515555"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Oct 2013 22:13:34 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r98MDWg2021501 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 8 Oct 2013 22:13:32 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([fe80::5404:b599:9f57:834b]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 17:13:32 -0500
From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, "draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop-05
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop-05
Thread-Index: AQHOuJubX0jJczo/r06LXwRyi7CvPJnrVISA
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 22:13:31 +0000
Message-ID: <69670F7146898C4583F56DA9AD32F77B215BDA7B@xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5D62D2D2-26DD-4BC4-A296-0C4AB414F549@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416
x-originating-ip: [10.128.2.47]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <437A7FFFB22F604D8524373F0CBD7817@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 15:50:24 -0700
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org Team (gen-art@ietf.org)" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org list" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 22:13:46 -0000
Ben, Thanks for your comments. I have incorporated all your comments in rev06 of this draft. On 9/23/13 1:29 PM, "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> wrote: >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > ><http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > >Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments >you may receive. > >Document: draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop-05 >Reviewer: Ben Campbell >Review Date: 2013-09-23 >IETF LC End Date: 2013-09-24 > >Summary: Ready for publication as an informational RFC. > >Major issues: > >None > >Minor issues: > >None > >Nits/editorial comments: > >-- Abstract: > >Please expand H-VPLS on first mention Done. > >-- section 1, 1st paragraph: > >Please expand VPLS on first mention. Done. > >-- section 4, 3rd to last paragraph: "Different PBB access networks..." > >The previous and subsequent paragraphs say "PBBN access networks". Should >this instance also say PBBN? Done. > >-- section 4.3: > >2nd paragraph says this scenario is applicable to "Loosely Coupled >Service Domains" and "Different Service Domains". The 4th paragraph >mentions "Tightly...". Does that mean the scenario also applies to >"Tightly Coupled Service Domains"? (i.e. should it be added to the 2nd >paragraph, or removed from the 4th?) > Removed "Tightly Š" from the 4th paragraph. Cheers, Ali
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-in… Ben Campbell
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpl… Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpl… Ben Campbell