Re: Clarification for Copyright to referred material in IETF draft

SM <sm@resistor.net> Tue, 14 December 2010 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B97928C0FA for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:56:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.469
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.130, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FLeYkvHO5eFU for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:56:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC71E28C0FE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:56:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.5.Alpha0/8.14.5.Alpha0) with ESMTP id oBEJvOts007903 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:57:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1292356671; x=1292443071; bh=GYVHe9AEBfLUgRHcgOjN4fP4W6IxgGLYnQSgpA2WlLM=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=ULOUK1GLEr84Px18PYDBDPAKvZixLRJtZ0X+tNlP+cwvbE5W1+FEOdS27MTIYhb4o FtHRsyXHvXVT2is3znrSPxcf7HlW1sca/lbp7Dzf6DwF0Gzya3jMpfZJ5miWOgABnx NET4ELHBVTBQ+YB2pDa+6cxONbZ75evPpb89ZEGY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1292356671; x=1292443071; bh=GYVHe9AEBfLUgRHcgOjN4fP4W6IxgGLYnQSgpA2WlLM=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=iJKwxQWwTPnzLYN/di8OX3lwy4ab1zfnl/kxs2Va0TdtRGvhjyKkoNOma2G0XzK6k KLTBdbJ9s9uNdCRsmsQY3ZcGTWKdM710ME2va9bW8+pye2GapsESMHzYpMRZuPVU5B BTznT9fWZHoQ5P0nbBmNhWl981t8BK1cyrgbt+b4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=nsBzApdilcM4asxvI3rdupPLoqWJZCeQXa18/4XmzU5IygB4ZhqtLd077w6gbQ/3g JQAQ9gJPxbQYShp/OmG1yS6pg24drBURsusvYbX7vMu9bmdVgHf8L4xrCXT9pfb1yZ+ /TQAj2GDoGGIOFspvdJEreaExanA2FzITHwNko8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20101214102615.083489a0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:56:52 -0800
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Clarification for Copyright to referred material in IETF draft
In-Reply-To: <4D0746C3.8050205@gmx.de>
References: <AANLkTik+5w7F4qFw_6qVDVi31VMW9gdbG4mGebsUiwGk@mail.gmail.com> <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D03BC6589@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET> <4D0746C3.8050205@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:56:16 -0000

Hi Julian,
At 02:28 14-12-10, Julian Reschke wrote:
>Out of curiosity, and because there may be drafts in the pipeline 
>having links like that...: for which reasons?

This question would have been better suited for the RFC Editor (see 
RFC-interest mailing list) as it pertains to RFC style.

Quoting Doug Ewell [1]:

   "I thought it would be good to let the list know that these misconceptions
    exist and may be widespread, because of the wide use of Wikipedia"

And text from draft-narten-iana-rir-ipv6-considerations-00:

   'At various times in the past, it has been asserted that we will
    "never run out of IPv6 addresses". For example, Wikipedia repeats the
    myth'

If you are writing a draft about HTTP, for example, you will most 
likely do some research about the protocol.  The best way to do that 
is to type the word "HTTP" in the browser bar and it will be 
magically transformed into an reference to the specification.  The 
webpage which will appear has been peer reviewed by people with more 
expertise than the HTTPbis working group. :-)

It is left as an exercise to the reader of the drafts in the pipeline 
having links like that to determine whether the authors used the 
above methodology.

Regards,
-sm

1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg06507.html