Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility-04.txt> (Update to RFC 3777 to Clarify Nominating Committee Eligibility of IETF Leadership) to Best Current Practice

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 27 September 2012 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F94B21F8534 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.078, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PtbNmpMhsQbV for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB8E21F85A0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.8] (ppp-67-124-89-127.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.124.89.127]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8RGJL4o010215 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:19:22 -0700
Message-ID: <50647C77.5070805@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:19:03 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility-04.txt> (Update to RFC 3777 to Clarify Nominating Committee Eligibility of IETF Leadership) to Best Current Practice
References: <20120927150522.9680.50930.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <8098D3F7-A030-49F0-ADBC-EE2F2F360D15@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <8098D3F7-A030-49F0-ADBC-EE2F2F360D15@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:19:24 -0000

On 9/27/2012 8:26 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
> I agree that this sentence needs changed.  However, I think that one other sentence should be updated while we are dealing with the IAOC in this document.
>
> RFC 3777 says:
>
>     Member Recall: This is the process by which the behavior of a sitting
>        member of the IESG or IAB may be questioned, perhaps resulting in
>        the removal of the sitting member.
>
> The community should also be able to recall an IAOC member.


That alters the scope of the draft abit.  Hence the title of the draft 
would now need to be something like:

    Update to RFC 3777 to Clarify Aspects of Eligibility and Recall

As for the earlier discussion seeking to exclude paid staff, I think it 
odd to have criteria that would permit /any/ paid staff to sit on 
Nomcom.  We pay for a number of folk 'staff' folk to show up and IETF 
meetings and none of them should qualify for Nomcom, IMO.

d/
-- 
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net