Re: draft discussion lists

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Wed, 03 September 2014 04:14 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F751A89DB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 21:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.666
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.666 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uv3Hjw-Q6TWl for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 21:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a109.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE811A89D4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 21:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a109.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a109.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE9B2005D826; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 21:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; s= cryptonector.com; bh=1sPNSVPF9zJZjDIV6twxRMMnoa0=; b=UkNM4XI4ew1 N0Ig2tuHcBT65jiFtCWU5iiFUo5xCRNGUMmV1Gko1kk67hH+xOpCGvRunuKKPDWD M0/NAbOFdTnGpityYBsdTGYp+m4DSLww3fKIldSuuQndVr/ROf9fjKzTgsBW1pUF /5SovACWib/9BqcixMwi6h2gonTyin+Q=
Received: from localhost (108-207-244-174.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.207.244.174]) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a109.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 081E52005D824; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 21:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 23:14:44 -0500
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: draft discussion lists
Message-ID: <20140903041442.GH2664@localhost>
References: <20140901175852.7BC681A0659@ietfa.amsl.com> <A8CC795A-D73F-4A15-89AA-C54FEA6F6C13@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A8CC795A-D73F-4A15-89AA-C54FEA6F6C13@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QsIF_hzPovzobdH0z6wnkzhG_SI
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 04:14:46 -0000

On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 04:07:28AM +0000, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
> The place I primarily see not-wg-names is irtf drafts
> (draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis), IAB drafts (draft-iab-doi), drafts
> from old working groups or non-wg lists
> (draft-tsou-behave-natx4-log-reduction), drafts whose authors haven’t
> decided what working group they target (draft-welzl-ecn-benefits,
> which could be in aqm or tsvwg) or are building towards what someone
> hopes will be such a group, and some where someone fat-fingered the
> name of a working group. There are at least some where someone is
> simply bringing up a topic (draft-wierenga-ietf-eduroam or
> draft-secretaries-good-practices). 

A lot of WGs and WG work items start life as individual submission I-Ds.
The tracker nowadays tracks their transformation into WG work items.

Nico
--