IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Secdir last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-08

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 18 February 2019 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6DC1277CC; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:08:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F4kMEZGiFis0; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:08:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x331.google.com (mail-ot1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96ACA129A87; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:08:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x331.google.com with SMTP id c18so7863262otl.13; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:08:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7zoCXliJbJOMF+NfVcO9W7wJJzJZEkCOOiD/aHhVits=; b=RSvlxKXs016UdNnSIVo/QBARgS5vQQkvsxBZtJ16aZFcSlrDLhTmGwn1mNdfR5LwfD XIcqV9fb1cY3FbeDAuuObyW49+vp+SucKS/F7rx5iGH84PWW7/gZF/0LsC0TxDQUtUOV fAvUTG88ina+YlgCp0wxWqJLmrOuYG6yz4w+dy6cTXIqeUCAZMZPqAp+oN36HTloiVh5 eI+obI4HVrsCcuBj0QwQGJO4zdJ9E1UuoT2WggtaYlcF+g7xSnB7Q/8wroY7iOMgTwyZ jcI7LsnZCuRHes7vPq8fihk4Hh71XuNvnZBuDFSRKrsW64o0OwpsbUV9hVkeaqDFyFVK cU2w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7zoCXliJbJOMF+NfVcO9W7wJJzJZEkCOOiD/aHhVits=; b=nr0ra2WaQD72vLBckVcfNNoO1DY3cpBPwWGbff928r+hgmmWX/Yp9cfdGE+50YJZXq LQcIsXQ6IwMrFJhajMWueqjyUMp/mrIjhnDvtPWlEbqgIMJ/J3cmX24+UY1WJ3+RaH7S XvgPGxLQyeEhdy0rRaYDyUA/D4WDk0N44MTD4l7K9G1tL7dD8B1xTYyERvUaODSmlVRP JsbPUUQE5LPQ1p25+0YtiT11lkPI23wSNAK8GnqihbdaxmqkKpXcfAyTNDcsbRHuYrOQ lpyoPmY/4hbvcPZemWPbMc+fPUw+NuS6UMAyxbcujKRe+xag9Jl28+nJtut1gStm/zhi /eGw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZc36Bod7V7c5/3tq83ue17lkJy+Vk1NxOAFC1fUuOP8c3/jZAq sbDvPALtrWlAEZ6vjgaRAtur11IQe8NcVcn8xzo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZae646toAn17Pvaa7fwYmj6mhrQZdJpHpaCDGBFGWtAJQLgOYMdDVyA/FAUDYXGhPWE7XMjMe3EqYCj8wnPSA=
X-Received: by 2002:a54:4391:: with SMTP id u17mr14165207oiv.111.1550509684825; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:08:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <154886569351.10484.4703007670359734409@ietfa.amsl.com> <B1723A6E-2CA3-40D4-8C61-2BF41C3C3FB2@mnot.net> <CAHbuEH5ucn6E9iyOi9TaJRNxE+n7V7=qYT3LTtYqvXrq4BvSfQ@mail.gmail.com> <1317558B-24DD-4CB7-BBB6-95E5946EF87A@mnot.net> <CALaySJK7y+v2XSFg5xh0=uk03J-wjPsWpTMRFMTYZcxY59+5Fw@mail.gmail.com> <AE45E283-0DC6-45BD-B4B5-3AA17A057896@mnot.net> <CALaySJJD-thi6Omg--Kq_26mdSXpj2=r7WR32H=7Ekx_UgRhrw@mail.gmail.com> <79B2F684-4CD4-4715-AED0-5D5A6E1DC612@mnot.net> <CALaySJK07hnp64M7okiC-D+_spAObF6KVWOMaNzJvrFVRM9KwA@mail.gmail.com> <20C12D43-1FB6-4EA4-BAAD-C50B9F73E75E@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <20C12D43-1FB6-4EA4-BAAD-C50B9F73E75E@mnot.net>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 12:07:28 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH6JADA4fdjBkYQaC02LSGdz4nv16QiE0LcdvKsL==TzEw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Secdir last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-08
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, IETF SecDir <secdir@ietf.org>, draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fc270205822e2aa9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/RCqH7quYMGmLUxhTrQa1HNr_3NQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 17:08:08 -0000

On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 9:58 PM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> On 18 Feb 2019, at 1:50 pm, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Because, by the time this becomes an RFC, I (the expert of the
> registry, IESG still willing), will
> >> work with IANA to get that set up. Probably during AUTH48.
> >
> > It would be nice if that were already done, but I'm good with that
> > assurance.  Kathleen?
>
> It seemed rash to set up the new process before the document was approved.
>

I'll leave it up to the current ADs, but having text that says something
like:

"The instructions included below are the initial set  to be used by IANA
and entered on the registry.  Subsequent updates will be made directly to
the registry, therefore that set is considered authoritative."

Would be helpful to avoid confusion.

Best regards,
Kathleen

>
> Cheers,
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>

-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email