Re: WG Review: Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc)

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sat, 31 August 2013 01:18 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E078E21E80A1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 18:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id auByBYCVJjUd for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 18:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F7721E8082 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 18:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.226.235.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7V1IQJa020263 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 18:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1377911918; bh=OKUfiZPlR/NnqoeMDRJ4haTLLJdJaaiiQhAoIHMzCzQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Ni/LkQ/x+Qdh1xRhwdLxxEhornuYTKGTLT5gsF9DoZFMP/o7GXUJRx4YLOlwKyGz+ D8eim9H1bzm6b1IdOhRN2pnxAJFZwyMWUay9x9tnJC5aSceIIzk5CB95RNfM8Nw1n+ 3mtseHlZ0P43zY4zRQdwfdQxwh6yvK2Qx09Ev2QM=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1377911918; i=@elandsys.com; bh=OKUfiZPlR/NnqoeMDRJ4haTLLJdJaaiiQhAoIHMzCzQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=hAdQRoZkbIy0h77jQZV5eGrFkmZ5apoT6C3zWZ2cvMnFOPigOZEi82AtL4hPPq1mi pDPAUjDINHd55P3/3+uEzpVO9TQJdO6hJe1u5mfoNwFbJ+x3mhfw1+msPzZSlzaMrS wmUsJ5Oq4lD1MddWmh9FL6E02arEpgdPFHZXI4hM=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130830175621.0c9472d0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 18:17:02 -0700
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: WG Review: Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc)
In-Reply-To: <20130830165300.16729.46895.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20130830165300.16729.46895.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 01:18:42 -0000

Hello,
At 09:53 30-08-2013, The IESG wrote:
>The Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc) working group in the Internet Area
>of the IETF is undergoing rechartering. The IESG has not made any

[snip]

>Milestones:
>   Done     - WG Last Call on DHCP Options for Internet Storage Name
>Service (draft-ietf-dhc-isnsoption-03.txt)
>   Done     - WG Last Call on Load Balancing for DHCPv6
>(draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-loadb-02.txt)
>   Done     - WG Last Call on Time Configuration Options for DHCPv6
>(draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-timeconfig-01.txt)
>   Done     - WG Last Call on IPv6 Prefix Options for DHCPv6
>(draft-troan-dhcpv6-opt-prefix-delegation-02.txt)
>   Done     - WG Last Call on DNS Configuration options for DHCPv6
>(draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsconfig-01.txt)
>   Done     - WG Last Call on NIS Configuration Options for DHCPv6
>(draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-nisconfig-01.txt)
>   Done     - Resubmit draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-28.txt to IESG
>   Done     - Identify DHCPv4 authentication design team
>   Done     - Identify DHCPv4 specification review design team
>   Done     - Identify DHCPv4 relay agent message authentication design
>team
>   Done     - Submit DHCP Options for Internet Storage Name Service to
>IESG (draft-ietf-dhc-isnsoption)
>   Done     - Submit DNS Configuration options for DHCPv6 to IESG
>(draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsconfig)
>   Done     - Submit NIS Configuratio Options for DHCPv6 to IESG
>(draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-nisconfig)
>   Done     - Submit IPv6 Prefix Options for DHCPv6 to IESG
>(draft-troan-dhcpv6-opt-prefix-delegation)
>   Done     - Submit 'Detection of Network Attachment (DNA) in IPv4' to
>IESG (draft-ietf-dhc-dna-ipv4)
>   Done     - Resolve IPR issues around 'Rapid Commit Option for DHCPv4'
>   Done     - Publish report on dual-stack issues in DHCP
>(draft-ietf-dhc-dual-stack)
>   Done     - Publish report on requirements for renumbering using
>stateless  DHCPv6 (draft-ietf-dhc-stateless-dhcpv6-renumbering)
>   Done     - Submit 'Lifetime Option for DHCPv6' to IESG
>(draft-ietf-dhc-lifetime)
>   Done     - Submit 'Rapid Commit Option for DHCPv4' to IESG
>(draft-ietf-dhc-rapid-commit-opt)
>   Done     - Submit DDNS/DHCP documents to IESG
>   Done     - Submit 'Node-Specific Client Identifiers for DHCPv4' to IESG
>(draft-ietf-dhc-3315id-for-v4)
>   Done     - WG last call for 'Subnet Allocation Option'
><draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-04>
>   Done     - WG last call on 'Virtual Subnet Selection Option'
><draft-ietf-dhc-vpn-option>
>   Oct 2007 - Submit 'Subnet Allocation Option'
>(draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-04) to IESG for Proposed Standard
>   Nov 2007 - WG last call on 'Guidelines for Creating New DHCP Options'
>(draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines)
>   Nov 2007 - Submit 'Virtual Subnet Selection Option',
>(draft-ietf-dhc-vpn-option) and (draft-ietf-dhc-agent-vpn-id) to IESG for
>Proposed Standard
>   Dec 2007 - WG last call for 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6'
>(draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
>   Jan 2008 - Submit 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6'
>(draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain) to IESG for Proposed Standard
>   Jan 2008 - Submit 'Guidelines for Creating New DHCP Options'
>(draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines) to IESG for Best Current Practice
>   Jan 2008 - Develop plan for advancing DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 plan to include
>completion of DHCPv4 specification review report, 'Implementation Issues
>with RFC 2131' (draft-ietf-dhc-implementation) for Informational
>   Feb 2008 - WG last call for 'Status of Reclassifying DHCPv4 Options'
>(draft-ietf-dhc-status-3942)
>   Feb 2008 - WG last call for 'Dual-stack clients and merging of data
>from DHCPv4 and DHCPv6' (draft-ietf-dhc-dual-stack-merge); waiting for
>more experience with IPv6 deployment
>   Feb 2008 - WG last call for 'Rebind Capability in DHCPv6 Reconfigure
>Messages'  (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind)
>   Mar 2008 - Submit 'Status of Reclassifying DHCPv4 Options'
>(draft-ietf-dhc-status-3942) to IESG for Informational
>   Apr 2008 - 2nd WG last call for 'DHCP Relay Agent Assignment
>Notification Option (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-agentopt-delegate) and 'DHCPv6
>Server Reply Sequence Number Option'  (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-srsn-option)
>   May 2008 - Submit 'Rebind Capability in DHCPv6 Reconfigure Messages'
>(draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind) to IESG for Proposed Standard
>   Jun 2008 - WG last call on 'Layer 2 Relay Agent Behaviour'
>(draft-ietf-dhc-layer2-relay-agent)
>   Jul 2008 - Submit 'Layer 2 Relay Agent Behaviour' to IESG
>(draft-ietf-dhc-layer2-relay-agent) for Informational
>   Jul 2008 - Submit 'DHCP Relay Agent Assignment Notification Option'
>(draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-agentopt-delegate) and 'DHCPv6 Server Reply
>Sequence Number Option' (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-srsn-option) to IESG for
>Proposed Standard
>   Jul 2008 - Recharter, if needed

Did the DHC working group read the milestones?  I ask because it's 
been a few years since the year 2008 ended.

I looked at the last draft mentioned above.  The last revision is 
dated February 2009.  The DHC working group was supposed to deliver 
that draft to the IESG in July 2008.

I looked up draft-ietf-dhc-container-opt-07.  The state as at April 
2013 mentions "WG Document Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by 
WGLC".  There is a note which says: "This document did NOT pass WGLC 
as there was no support for it and Ralph indicated that there were 
several IESG Discusses from several years ago (2009) that did not get 
addressed".

Regards,
S. Moonesamy